• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从科学传播的“赤字”到对话：对话传播模式需要科学家扮演更多角色。

From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists.

机构信息

Center of Education and Training, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Julius Center, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

EMBO Rep. 2020 Sep 3;21(9):e51278. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051278. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

DOI:10.15252/embr.202051278
PMID:32748995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7506985/
Abstract

The 'one-way' expert model of science communication is out of date. The new dialogue model requires from scientists more than just providing expert knowledge to the publics.

摘要

“单向”的专家式科学传播模式已经过时。新的对话模式要求科学家不仅仅向公众提供专业知识。

相似文献

1
From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists.从科学传播的“赤字”到对话：对话传播模式需要科学家扮演更多角色。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Sep 3;21(9):e51278. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051278. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.传播还是参与？探索荷兰科学家的定义和科学传播目标。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277677. eCollection 2022.
3
Examining science communication on Reddit: From an "Assembled" to a "Disassembling" approach.审视 Reddit 上的科学传播：从“组装”到“拆解”的方法。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):473-488. doi: 10.1177/09636625211057231. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑：为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在？
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.
5
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.理解生态学和保护学中科学实践差距成因观点的概念框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Constructing publics in museums' science communication.在博物馆的科学传播中构建公众
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Nov;28(8):958-972. doi: 10.1177/0963662519870692. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
Influence in science dialogue: Individual attitude changes as a result of dialogue between laypersons and scientists.科学对话中的影响：外行与科学家之间的对话导致个人态度的变化。
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Oct;21(7):848-64. doi: 10.1177/0963662510386292. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
8
Empirically supported out-of-the-box strategies for science communication by environmental scientists.环境科学家进行科学传播的经验支持的现成策略。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Jul;15(4):499-504. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4145. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
The social-mediated crisis communication research: Revisiting dialogue between organizations and publics in crises of China.社会介导的危机传播研究：重新审视中国危机中组织与公众之间的对话
Public Relat Rev. 2020 Mar;46(1):101769. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Moving beyond narrow definitions of gene drive: Diverse perspectives and frames enable substantive dialogue among science and humanities teachers in the United States and United Kingdom.超越狭隘的基因驱动定义：多元化的视角和框架使美国和英国的科学和人文教师之间能够进行实质性的对话。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):727-744. doi: 10.1177/09636625221148697. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to public engagement with biodiversity conservation.公众参与生物多样性保护的障碍。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70078. Epub 2025 Jul 13.
2
Ten facts from critical and interpretive social sciences for environmental research.批判性与诠释性社会科学为环境研究提供的十个事实。
iScience. 2025 May 23;28(6):112736. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112736. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
3
Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.基于年龄的基因组筛查：儿科医疗服务提供者对实施的看法。
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):180-189. doi: 10.1159/000545839. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
4
What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education.当我们谈论受众时，我们在谈论什么？探索科学传播研究与教育中的受众概念。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/09636625241280349. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
Navigating chronic uncertainty: a theory synthesis for nursing communication in life-limiting illness.应对慢性不确定性：晚期疾病护理沟通的理论综合
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 13;23(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02328-7.
6
The evolution and ongoing challenge of unproven cell-based interventions.未经证实的基于细胞的干预措施的演变和持续挑战。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(9):851-858. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szae050.
7
Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing.通过公众参与进行治理：人类基因组编辑的前瞻性方法。
Sci Public Policy. 2024 Mar 25;51(4):680-691. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scae010. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement with science news predicted by the use of accessibility strategies in science-minded and general audiences.科学素养较高的受众和普通受众使用无障碍策略对科学新闻的认知、情感和行为参与度的预测。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Jan;34(1):92-113. doi: 10.1177/09636625241252561. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
Response of Unvaccinated US Adults to Official Information About the Pause in Use of the Johnson & Johnson-Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.未接种疫苗的美国成年人对暂停使用强生-杨森 COVID-19 疫苗的官方信息的反应：横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 1;26:e41559. doi: 10.2196/41559.
10
Public participation in human genome editing research governance: what do scientists think?公众参与人类基因组编辑研究治理：科学家怎么看？
J Community Genet. 2024 Jun;15(3):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00701-2. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientists' views about communication objectives.科学家对传播目标的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Aug;27(6):708-730. doi: 10.1177/0963662517728478. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
3
Constitutional moments in governing science and technology.治理科学和技术的宪制时刻。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):621-38. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
4
What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.科学传播的下一步是什么？有前途的方向和挥之不去的干扰。
Am J Bot. 2009 Oct;96(10):1767-78. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900041. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
5
Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.社会对话需要的不仅仅是公众参与。融合研究的科学与社会系列。
EMBO Rep. 2009 Apr;10(4):313-7. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.43.
6
Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective.幼儿人工耳蜗植入的伦理学：聋人世界视角的综述与回应
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Oct;119(4):297-313. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70070-1.