McCarthy Ella, Grant Will J
The Australian National University, Australia.
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/09636625241280349. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
The concept of 'audience' is central to research and practice in science communication. When asked by a scientist for help communicating their work, who among us has not responded with the time honoured question 'who is your audience?' Yet what we mean when we talk about audience is not always clear: implied and ambiguous, rather than explicit and precise. This article explores this ambiguity, drawing on a systematic review of 1360 science communication research articles and a survey of 45 science communication educators. We report 10 different conceptualisations, in three groups. conceptualisations include 'Demographic', 'Knowledge', 'Values' and 'Embodied'; conceptualisations include 'Interaction' and 'Dynamic'. In , we found 'Diverse', 'Potential', 'Plural' and 'General' conceptualisations. These data allow tracking of how we have conceptualised audience over time, an understanding of the groups systematically under-serviced, and a pathway to a richer discussion of this key concept for our field.
“受众”概念是科学传播研究与实践的核心。当一位科学家寻求帮助来传播他们的研究成果时,我们当中谁没有用那个由来已久的问题回应过:“你的受众是谁?”然而,当我们谈论受众时,我们的意思并不总是清晰的:它是隐含且模糊的,而非明确和精确的。本文借助对1360篇科学传播研究文章的系统综述以及对45位科学传播教育工作者的调查,探讨了这种模糊性。我们报告了三组共10种不同的概念化方式。第一组概念化方式包括“人口统计学特征”“知识”“价值观”和“具身化”;第二组概念化方式包括“互动”和“动态”。在第三组中,我们发现了“多样”“潜在”“多元”和“一般”等概念化方式。这些数据有助于追踪我们如何随着时间的推移对受众进行概念化,了解哪些群体系统性地未得到充分服务,并为我们这个领域更深入地讨论这一关键概念提供一条途径。