• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视 Reddit 上的科学传播:从“组装”到“拆解”的方法。

Examining science communication on Reddit: From an "Assembled" to a "Disassembling" approach.

机构信息

Texas State University, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):473-488. doi: 10.1177/09636625211057231. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1177/09636625211057231
PMID:35023409
Abstract

This study examines science communication within Ask Me Anything sessions hosted by US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientists on Reddit. In addition to considering a unique social media platform, our work makes an important contribution in revealing the limitations of a traditional approach to studying science communication and modeling an alternative. First, using an "assembled" approach, we qualitatively explore themes in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientists' posts and consider how they reflect the goals of "deficit" and "dialogue" models. Second, using a "disassembling" approach, inspired by Davies and Horst and actor-network theory, we more deeply examine our experiences studying the Ask Me Anything sessions. We then demonstrate how this alternative approach identifies "hidden" human and non-human actants that may have shaped science communication as "mediators." We use these insights to reject the common assumption that science communication on social media occurs solely and directly between scientists and publics.

摘要

这项研究考察了美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)科学家在 Reddit 上主持的问答(Ask Me Anything,AMA)会议中的科学传播。除了考虑一个独特的社交媒体平台外,我们的工作还在揭示研究科学传播的传统方法的局限性和建立替代方法方面做出了重要贡献。首先,我们使用“组装”方法,从质化的角度探讨了 NOAA 科学家帖子中的主题,并考虑了它们如何反映“缺陷”和“对话”模型的目标。其次,受戴维斯和霍斯特以及行动者网络理论的启发,我们使用“分解”方法更深入地研究了我们研究 AMA 会议的经验。然后,我们展示了这种替代方法如何识别可能作为“中介”塑造科学传播的“隐藏”的人和非人的行动者。我们利用这些见解来拒绝一种常见的假设,即社交媒体上的科学传播仅在科学家和公众之间直接发生。

相似文献

1
Examining science communication on Reddit: From an "Assembled" to a "Disassembling" approach.审视 Reddit 上的科学传播:从“组装”到“拆解”的方法。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):473-488. doi: 10.1177/09636625211057231. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
I am a scientist . . . Ask Me Anything: Examining differences between male and female scientists participating in a Reddit AMA session.我是一名科学家……有问必答:探讨参与 Reddit AMA 会议的男女科学家之间的差异。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):458-472. doi: 10.1177/09636625211048775. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.一种新兴的公众参与科学的形式:Reddit r/science 上的“问我任何事”(AMA)会议。
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216789. eCollection 2019.
4
Online community queries on hormonal male contraception: An analysis of the Reddit "Ask Me Anything" experience.在线社区对男性荷尔蒙避孕的咨询:对 Reddit“问我任何事”经验的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.传播还是参与?探索荷兰科学家的定义和科学传播目标。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277677. eCollection 2022.
6
Investigating mediated public engagement with science on the "science" subreddit: From the participants' perspective.调查“科学”子版块中科学传播的中介公众参与:从参与者的角度。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249181. eCollection 2021.
7
Addressing immediate public coronavirus (COVID-19) concerns through social media: Utilizing Reddit's AMA as a framework for Public Engagement with Science.通过社交媒体解决当前公众对冠状病毒(COVID-19)的担忧:利用 Reddit 的 AMA 作为与公众进行科学互动的框架。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240326. eCollection 2020.
8
Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study From Multiple Social Media Platforms.识别电子烟用户生成内容的主题:来自多个社交媒体平台的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5780.
9
More engagement but less participation: China's alternative approach to public communication of science and technology.更多的参与度,更少的参与度:中国在科学技术公共传播方面的替代方法。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Apr;31(3):331-339. doi: 10.1177/09636625221090729.
10
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific clickbait: Examining media coverage and readability in genome-wide association research.科学噱头:全基因组关联研究中的媒体报道和可读性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296323. eCollection 2024.
2
Engaging the public or asking your friends? Analysing science-related crowdfunding using behavioural and survey data.吸引公众或询问你的朋友?使用行为和调查数据分析与科学相关的众筹。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Nov;31(8):993-1011. doi: 10.1177/09636625221113134. Epub 2022 Aug 2.