Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café, SN, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Odontology. 2021 Jan;109(1):284-294. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00543-7. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Evaluate, through a randomized clinical trial, the efficacy of brushing associated with oral irrigation in maintaining implant and overdenture hygiene. Thirty-eight participants, who had a clinically acceptable conventional maxillary complete denture and mandibular overdenture retained by either implants or mini-implants using an O-ring-retained system, were enrolled to participate in the study. They were instructed to use two different hygiene methods, in a random sequence for a period of 14 days, with a 7-day wash-out interposed period: (I) mechanical brushing (MB); (II) association of mechanical brushing with oral irrigation (WP). Biofilms from both subgingival sulci and overdentures were collected and processed by Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method at baseline and after using the proposed hygiene protocols. Comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon test and Friedman test with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate, followed by Conover post-hoc test (α = 0.05). In the subgingival sulci-related biofilm, a lower number of microbial cells were detected, after WP compared to the MB method (P < 0.001). The findings of overdenture-related biofilm suggest that both methods were similar (P = 0.607) being the identified microbiota qualitatively coincident after each method. Despite the number of microbial counts, it was concluded that the association of mechanical brushing with oral irrigation was more effective in reducing microorganisms in the subgingival sulci biofilm; however, the same outcome was not observed in the overdentures.
通过一项随机临床试验评估刷牙联合口腔冲洗在维持种植体和覆盖义齿卫生方面的疗效。研究纳入了 38 名参与者,他们均有临床可接受的传统上颌全口义齿和下颌覆盖义齿,这些义齿由种植体或迷你种植体通过 O 型环保留系统保留。参与者被指示在 14 天内随机使用两种不同的清洁方法,其间插入 7 天的洗脱期:(I)机械刷牙(MB);(II)机械刷牙联合口腔冲洗(WP)。在基线和使用拟议的清洁方案后,从龈下沟和覆盖义齿采集生物膜并通过 checkerboard DNA-DNA 杂交方法进行处理。使用 Wilcoxon 检验和 Friedman 检验与 Benjamini-Hochberg 错误发现率进行比较,然后进行 Conover 事后检验(α=0.05)。在龈下沟相关生物膜中,与 MB 方法相比,WP 方法检测到的微生物细胞数量更少(P<0.001)。覆盖义齿相关生物膜的研究结果表明,两种方法相似(P=0.607),每种方法后鉴定的微生物群落定性一致。尽管微生物计数的数量有所不同,但可以得出结论,机械刷牙联合口腔冲洗在减少龈下沟生物膜中的微生物方面更有效;然而,在覆盖义齿中没有观察到相同的结果。