Morquecho-Campos Paulina, Bikker Floris J, Nazmi Kamran, de Graaf Kees, Laine Marja L, Boesveldt Sanne
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Physiol Behav. 2020 Nov 1;226:113116. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113116. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Exposure to sensory food cues such as smell, vision, taste and/or texture may trigger anticipatory physiological responses such as salivation, participating on adequate metabolism of the signaled food. However, the individual contribution of each sensory modality as well as the impact of particular food products on salivation and salivary composition remains unclear. Therefore, by systematically varying sensory modalities and nutrient content of food stimuli, we investigated their effect on saliva secretion, α-amylase activity and other salivary characteristics (pH level, buffering capacity, MUC5B concentration, and total protein content). Over 3 sessions, 46 normal-weight healthy participants were exposed to 12 conditions, consisting of 4 levels of sensory stimulation (odor, odor + vision, odor + vision + taste, and odor + vision + taste + mastication) and 3 types of stimuli (bread, high-in-starch; cucumber, low-in-starch; and parafilm as non-food control) during which saliva was collected. Linear mixed models showed a significant increase in salivation with increasing levels of sensory stimulation. α-amylase secretion rate increased upon the highest level of stimulation, which involved mastication, compared to odor and odor + visual level of stimulation. Other salivary characteristics varied with the level of sensory stimulation, which might be related to the total volume of salivation. The type of stimuli did not influence the saliva composition (α-amylase concentration nor other salivary components). Our findings indicate that cumulative sensory information, rather than specific (food) product, play a vital role in anticipatory salivary responses.
接触嗅觉、视觉、味觉和/或质地等感官食物线索可能会引发预期的生理反应,如唾液分泌,这有助于所暗示食物的充分代谢。然而,每种感官模式的个体贡献以及特定食品对唾液分泌和唾液成分的影响仍不清楚。因此,通过系统地改变食物刺激的感官模式和营养成分,我们研究了它们对唾液分泌、α-淀粉酶活性和其他唾液特征(pH值、缓冲能力、MUC5B浓度和总蛋白含量)的影响。在3个阶段中,46名体重正常的健康参与者接触了12种条件,包括4种感官刺激水平(气味、气味+视觉、气味+视觉+味觉和气味+视觉+味觉+咀嚼)和3种刺激类型(面包,高淀粉;黄瓜,低淀粉;以及作为非食物对照的石蜡膜),在此期间收集唾液。线性混合模型显示,随着感官刺激水平的增加,唾液分泌显著增加。与气味和气味+视觉刺激水平相比,在涉及咀嚼的最高刺激水平下,α-淀粉酶分泌率增加。其他唾液特征随感官刺激水平而变化,这可能与唾液分泌总量有关。刺激类型不影响唾液成分(α-淀粉酶浓度或其他唾液成分)。我们的研究结果表明,累积的感官信息而非特定的(食物)产品在预期的唾液反应中起着至关重要的作用。