• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中药注射剂对2019冠状病毒病患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案

The efficacy and safety of Chinese traditional medicine injections on patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

作者信息

Li Yulin, Xu Haonan, Lang Hui, Li Jing, Bi Lin, Li Yanqing, Dong Liang, Zhang Lin, Liang Xin, Zhu Hongqiu

机构信息

Department of Andrology, The Reproductive and Women-Children Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan.

Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21024. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021024.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000021024
PMID:32756089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7402801/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The pandemic caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has exposed vulnerable populations to an unprecedented global health crisis. Research reported that Chinese traditional medicine injections were used in patients with COVID-19 infection and showed significant effects, and there have been no systematic review and meta-analyses to investigate the effects and safety of Chinese traditional medicine injections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 statement. The literature search will involve Cochran library, Web of science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, China Biology Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP, Wang Fang database, and China Clinical Trial Registration Center for articles and research published form December 2019. This search will include randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized controlled trial studies and the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies for nonrandomized studies will be used to assess the risk of bias among the studies included in the systematic review. Review Manager 5.3 software will be used for the meta-analysis, and odds ratio are calculated as the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses will then be performed based on the characteristics of the interventions and populations included in the studies examined.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review protocol is designed to provide evidence regarding the effects and safety of Chinese traditional medicine injections on patients with COVID-19, such evidence may be useful and important for clinical treatment decisions. The results should be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Since the data and results used in the systematic review will be extracted exclusively from published studies, approval from an ethics committee will not be required.

摘要

引言

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染引发的大流行使弱势群体面临前所未有的全球健康危机。研究报告称,COVID-19感染患者使用了中药注射剂,且显示出显著效果,但尚无系统评价和荟萃分析来调查中药注射剂的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析方案基于《系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目2015声明》。文献检索将涉及考克兰图书馆、科学网、PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、中国生物医学数据库、中国知网数据库、维普、万方数据库以及中国临床试验注册中心,检索2019年12月以来发表的文章和研究。该检索将包括随机对照试验和非随机研究。将使用Cochrane协作网的随机对照试验研究工具和非随机研究定量研究质量评估工具来评估纳入系统评价的研究中的偏倚风险。将使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行荟萃分析,并计算比值比作为主要结局。然后将根据所审查研究中纳入的干预措施和人群的特征进行亚组分析。

伦理与传播

本系统评价方案旨在提供关于中药注射剂对COVID-19患者疗效和安全性的证据,此类证据对于临床治疗决策可能有用且重要。研究结果应通过在同行评审期刊上发表进行传播。由于系统评价中使用的数据和结果将仅从已发表的研究中提取,因此无需伦理委员会批准。

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of Chinese traditional medicine injections on patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.中药注射剂对2019冠状病毒病患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21024. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021024.
2
The effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of children with COVID-19.中药治疗儿童新型冠状病毒肺炎的有效性和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21247. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021247.
3
Traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of overview.用于治疗肺纤维化的中药:一项系统评价和概述性荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021310.
4
Chinese medicine for coronavirus disease 2019 as complementary therapy: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.2019冠状病毒病的中医药辅助治疗:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21034. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021034.
5
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.中药治疗新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)肺炎:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 8;9(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01343-4.
6
Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of coronavirus disease (covid-19) in 2019: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.连花清瘟联合传统抗病毒西药治疗2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21404. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021404.
7
Efficacy of integrative Traditional Chinese and Western medicine for the treatment of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.中西医结合治疗2019新型冠状病毒感染患者(COVID-19)的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e20781. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020781.
8
Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine injection for COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.中成药注射剂治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20706. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020706.
9
The efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen (LHQW) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.连花清瘟(LHQW)治疗冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的疗效和安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e20979. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020979.
10
Reduning injection combined with western medicine for pneumonia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.热毒宁注射液联合西药治疗肺炎:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22757. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022757.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of the COVID-19 pandemic in Henan Province: a retrospective study.河南省中医药治疗 COVID-19 大流行的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Feb 13;28(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01006-9.
2
Chinese herbal medicine: Fighting SARS-CoV-2 infection on all fronts.中草药:全方位抗击 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2021 Apr 24;270:113869. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.113869. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
The Relevance of Complementary and Integrative Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Review of the Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for Prevention and Control of COVID-19 (Edition 6).新型冠状病毒肺炎防控方案(第六版)
China CDC Wkly. 2020 May 8;2(19):321-326. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2020.082.
2
Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.新冠病毒的基因组特征和流行病学:对病毒起源和受体结合的影响。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):565-574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.
补充与整合医学在新冠疫情中的相关性:文献的定性综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 11;7:587749. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.587749. eCollection 2020.
新型冠状病毒感染肺炎在中国武汉的早期传播动力学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
4
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
5
XueBiJing Injection Versus Placebo for Critically Ill Patients With Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.血必净注射液对比安慰剂治疗重症社区获得性肺炎患者的随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):e735-e743. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003842.
6
A real-world study on adverse drug reactions to Xuebijing injection: hospital intensive monitoring based on 93 hospitals (31,913 cases).一项关于血必净注射液药物不良反应的真实世界研究:基于93家医院(31913例病例)的医院强化监测。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(6):117. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.26.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
8
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
9
Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.医疗保健中的系统评价:在荟萃分析中调查和处理发表偏倚及其他偏倚
BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):101-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101.