• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北美销售的婴儿配方奶粉:评估其环境影响。

Powdered Baby Formula Sold in North America: Assessing the Environmental Impact.

机构信息

Healthy Children Project, East Sandwich, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Breastfeed Med. 2020 Oct;15(10):671-679. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1089/bfm.2020.0090
PMID:32758012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7575352/
Abstract

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Greenhouse Gas emissions must decline by around 45% by 2030 and reach net zero in 2050. Biofuels, solar, and wind energy are obvious choices for reduction of the 75% of emissions from the energy sector (including transportation), but making reductions in the remaining 25%, the food sector, is more of a challenge. One way is to change our diets to increase low-carbon food alternatives. We chose to examine the impact of powdered baby formula products. The aim of this study is to compute a minimal estimate of green house gas (GHG) emissions for powdered baby formula products sold in North America comprising Canada, Mexico, and the United States. We found that in 2016, the North America Greenhouse Gas emissions (in tons of CO eq.) attributable to sales of powdered formula for Canada was 70,256, for Mexico, 435,820, and for the United States, 655,956. The North American per capita emissions based on infants and toddlers from birth to 36 months of age in 2016 was, at a minimum, 59.06 kg of CO eq. The environmental and Greenhouse Gas impact of powdered baby formula, and related hazards arising from climate change, can be a relevant factor for health care providers in their advice to families on infant feeding. This study makes an innovative and potentially useful addition to the emerging evidence on this issue and should be considered when developing and funding infant and young child feeding policies and supportive programs.

摘要

根据政府间气候变化专门委员会的数据,温室气体排放必须在 2030 年之前减少约 45%,并在 2050 年达到净零排放。减少 75%的温室气体排放(包括交通领域)显然可以选择生物燃料、太阳能和风能,但要减少剩余 25%的温室气体排放,即食品部门,就更具挑战性了。一种方法是改变我们的饮食,增加低碳食品的替代品。我们选择研究婴儿配方奶粉产品的影响。本研究的目的是计算在北美(包括加拿大、墨西哥和美国)销售的粉状婴儿配方奶粉产品的温室气体 (GHG) 排放量的最小估计值。我们发现,2016 年,加拿大销售的粉状配方奶粉的北美温室气体排放量(以吨二氧化碳当量计)为 70256 吨,墨西哥为 435820 吨,美国为 655956 吨。2016 年,从婴儿出生到 36 个月大的婴儿和幼儿的人均排放量至少为 59.06 公斤二氧化碳当量。婴儿配方奶粉的环境和温室气体影响,以及气候变化带来的相关危害,可能是医疗保健提供者在向家庭提供婴儿喂养建议时的一个相关因素。本研究为这一问题的新出现证据提供了创新和潜在有用的补充,在制定和资助婴儿和幼儿喂养政策和支持性计划时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Powdered Baby Formula Sold in North America: Assessing the Environmental Impact.北美销售的婴儿配方奶粉:评估其环境影响。
Breastfeed Med. 2020 Oct;15(10):671-679. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0090. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Climate Change and Infant Nutrition: Estimates of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Milk Formula Sold in Selected Asia Pacific Countries.气候变化与婴儿营养:选定亚太国家销售的配方奶粉温室气体排放量估算。
J Hum Lact. 2021 May;37(2):314-322. doi: 10.1177/0890334421994769. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
A commentary on the carbon footprint of milk formula: harms to planetary health and policy implications.关于配方奶粉碳足迹的评论:对行星健康的危害及政策影响。
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Nov 27;14:49. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0243-8. eCollection 2019.
4
Alimentation infantile et changements climatiques : une opportunité prometteuse.婴幼儿喂养与气候变化:一个充满希望的机会。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Jun;115(3):477-481. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00869-7. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
5
Breastfeeding and weaning practices in rural Mexico.墨西哥农村地区的母乳喂养与断奶习俗
Nutr Health. 1994;9(4):255-63. doi: 10.1177/026010609400900402.
6
Assessing Strategies to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.评估减少美国眼科学会年会碳足迹的策略。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 1;141(9):862-869. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3516.
7
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
8
Travel Distance Between Participants in US Telemedicine Sessions With Estimates of Emissions Savings: Observational Study.美国远程医疗会议中参与者之间的旅行距离及减排量估算:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e53437. doi: 10.2196/53437.
9
The carbon footprint of the Chinese health-care system: an environmentally extended input-output and structural path analysis study.中国医疗体系的碳足迹:基于环境扩展投入产出和结构路径分析的研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Oct;3(10):e413-e419. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30192-5.
10
Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance.将爱尔兰奶牛场牛奶的碳足迹与经济绩效联系起来。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Oct;98(10):7394-407. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9222. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Infant and Young Child Feeding Recommendations From a Planetary Health Perspective.从行星健康角度解决婴幼儿喂养建议。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Nov;15(11):100303. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100303. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Breastfeeding and Environmental Consciousness: A Narrative Review of Environmental Implications and Potential Contributions to Reduce Waste and Energy Consumption.母乳喂养与环境意识:关于环境影响以及减少废物和能源消耗潜在贡献的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 24;15(9):e45878. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45878. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Species in the Built Food Production Environment: A Review on Persistence, Pathogenicity, Regulation and Detection Methods.人工食品生产环境中的物种:关于持久性、致病性、监管及检测方法的综述
Microorganisms. 2023 May 24;11(6):1379. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061379.
4
Environmental Impact of Feeding with Infant Formula in Comparison with Breastfeeding.母乳喂养与配方奶喂养的环境影响比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116397.

本文引用的文献

1
A commentary on the carbon footprint of milk formula: harms to planetary health and policy implications.关于配方奶粉碳足迹的评论:对行星健康的危害及政策影响。
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Nov 27;14:49. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0243-8. eCollection 2019.
2
Support for breastfeeding is an environmental imperative.支持母乳喂养是一项环境必需之事。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5646.
3
The carbon footprint of breastmilk substitutes in comparison with breastfeeding.与母乳喂养相比,母乳代用品的碳足迹。
J Clean Prod. 2019 Jun 10;222:436-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.043.
4
Nutrition Recommendations in Pregnancy and Lactation.孕期及哺乳期的营养建议。
Med Clin North Am. 2016 Nov;100(6):1199-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.004.
5
Suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: Maternal and pediatric health outcomes and costs.美国的母乳喂养不充分:母婴健康结果与成本
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jan;13(1). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12366. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
6
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?为何要投资,以及需要采取哪些措施来改善母乳喂养做法?
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2.
7
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.21 世纪的母乳喂养:流行病学、机制和终身效应。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
8
Ontogeny of taste preferences: basic biology and implications for health.味觉偏好的发生发展:基础生物学与健康影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Mar;99(3):704S-11S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.067694. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
9
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.纯母乳喂养的最佳时长。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.pub2.
10
The history of infant nutrition.婴儿营养史。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010 May-Jun;86(3):179-88. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1984.