Mental Health Center, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113261. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113261. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
Psychological resilience is characterized as the ability to respond to extreme stress or trauma or adverse experience successfully. While the relation between public emergencies and psychological distress is well known, research on therelationship between psychological resilience and mental health is very limited during the outbreak of public health emergencies.
This research investigated the relationship between psychological resilience and mental health (depression, anxiety, somatization symptoms) among the general population in China.
Psychological resilience, depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms of 1770 Chinese citizens were investigated during the epidemic peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (23rd February 2020 to 2nd March 2020). The analyses were done through the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) scale.
The prevalence of depression, anxiety, somatization symptoms was found to be 47.1%, 31.9%, 45.9%, respectively, among all participants. From them, 18.2% showed moderate to severe symptoms of depression, 8.8% showed moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety, and 16.6% showed moderate to severe symptoms of somatization. Psychological resilience was negatively correlated with depression (standardized β = -0.490, P < 0.001), anxiety (standardized β = -0.443, P < 0.001), and somatization symptom scores (standardized β = -0.358, P < 0.001), while controlling for confounding factors. Analysis of the three-factor resilience structure showed that strength and tenacity were correlated with depression (standardized β = -0.256, P < 0.001; standardized β = -0.217, P < 0.001), anxiety (standardized β = -0.268, P < 0.001; standardized β = -0.147, P < 0.001), and somatization symptoms (standardized β = -0.236, P < 0.001; standardized β = -0.126, P < 0.01).
Our results suggest that there is a high prevalence of psychological distresses among the general population at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in China, which is negatively correlated with resilience. Psychological resilience represents an essential target for psychological intervention in a public health emergency.
心理弹性的特点是能够成功应对极端压力、创伤或不良经历。虽然公众突发事件与心理困扰之间的关系众所周知,但在突发公共卫生事件期间,关于心理弹性与心理健康之间关系的研究非常有限。
本研究旨在调查中国普通人群的心理弹性与心理健康(抑郁、焦虑、躯体化症状)之间的关系。
在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情高峰期间(2020 年 2 月 23 日至 3 月 2 日),对 1770 名中国公民的心理弹性、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化症状进行了调查。采用 Connor-Davidson 弹性量表(CD-RISC)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7 量表(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-15(PHQ-15)量表进行分析。
所有参与者中,抑郁、焦虑、躯体化症状的患病率分别为 47.1%、31.9%和 45.9%。其中,18.2%表现为中重度抑郁症状,8.8%表现为中重度焦虑症状,16.6%表现为中重度躯体化症状。心理弹性与抑郁(标准化β=-0.490,P<0.001)、焦虑(标准化β=-0.443,P<0.001)和躯体化症状评分(标准化β=-0.358,P<0.001)呈负相关,同时控制了混杂因素。对三因素弹性结构的分析表明,力量和坚韧与抑郁(标准化β=-0.256,P<0.001;标准化β=-0.217,P<0.001)、焦虑(标准化β=-0.268,P<0.001;标准化β=-0.147,P<0.001)和躯体化症状(标准化β=-0.236,P<0.001;标准化β=-0.126,P<0.01)相关。
我们的研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 疫情高峰期,中国普通人群中存在较高的心理困扰发生率,与弹性呈负相关。心理弹性是突发公共卫生事件中心理干预的一个重要目标。