Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, P.O.Box 4600 Forus, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2RT, United Kingdom.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103228. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103228. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Despite the breadth and diversity of research and policies on care transitions, research studies often report similar components that affect the quality and safety of care, including communication across professional groups and care settings, transfer of information, coordination of resources or training of healthcare personnel. In this article, we aim to deepen our understanding of care transitions by proposing a heuristic research framework that takes into account the components and factors influencing the quality and safety of care transitions in diverse settings.
Using a pragmatic qualitative narrative meta-synthesis of empirically grounded research studies (N = 13) involving 31 researchers from seven countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the UK), we conducted a thematic analysis to identify the components analysed in the included studies. We then used these components to create a framework for researching care transitions.
Our narrative synthesis found that the quality and safety of care transitions are influenced by a range of patient-centred, communicative, collaborative, cultural, competency-based, accountability-based and spatial components. These components are encompassed within a broader set of dimensions that require careful consideration: (1) the conceptualising of the care transition notion, (2) the methodology for researching care transitions, (3) the role of patients and carers in care transitions, (4) the complexity surrounding care transitions, (5) the boundaries intertwined in care transitions and (6) care transition improvement interventions. These six dimensions constitute an analytical framework for planning and conducting research on care transitions in diverse settings.
The proposed six-dimensional framework for researching quality and safety in care transitions offers a roadmap for future practice and policy interventions and provides a starting point for planning and designing future research.
尽管针对护理交接的研究和政策广泛多样,但研究报告通常报告出相似的影响护理质量和安全的组成部分,包括跨专业团队和护理环境的沟通、信息传递、资源协调或医疗保健人员的培训。在本文中,我们旨在通过提出一个考虑不同环境下影响护理交接质量和安全的组成部分和因素的启发式研究框架,来加深我们对护理交接的理解。
我们对涉及来自 7 个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、德国、荷兰、挪威和英国)的 31 名研究人员的 13 项基于实证的研究进行了实用定性叙述性元综合,使用主题分析来确定纳入研究中分析的组成部分。然后,我们使用这些组成部分创建了一个研究护理交接的框架。
我们的叙述性综合发现,护理交接的质量和安全性受到一系列以患者为中心的、沟通、协作、文化、基于能力、基于问责制和空间组成部分的影响。这些组成部分包含在更广泛的维度中,需要仔细考虑:(1)护理交接概念的概念化,(2)护理交接研究的方法,(3)患者和照顾者在护理交接中的作用,(4)护理交接周围的复杂性,(5)护理交接中交织的边界以及(6)护理交接改进干预措施。这六个维度构成了在不同环境中规划和进行护理交接研究的分析框架。
提出的护理交接质量和安全研究的六维框架为未来的实践和政策干预提供了路线图,并为规划和设计未来的研究提供了起点。