Teixeira Paulo E P, Alawdah Laila, Alhassan Hassan Adam A, Guidetti Matteo, Priori Alberto, Papatheodorou Stefania, Fregni Felipe
MGH Institute of Health Professions.
Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital.
Princ Pract Clin Res. 2020 Jan-Apr;6(1):23-26. doi: 10.21801/ppcrj.2020.61.5. Epub 2020 May 21.
The analgesic effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) combined with physical therapy remain unclear.
To systematically review available evidence comparing tDCS with any physical therapy modality (PTM) to PTM alone or PTM with sham tDCS on pain relief on common musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, namely knee osteoarthritis (KOA), chronic low back pain (CLBP), myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and fibromyalgia.
EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched from inception to April 2019 for randomized controlled trials. Reviewers independently assessed the studies quality and extracted data according to the PRISMA protocol. The GRADE approach was used to asses quality of evidence and a "Summary of Findings" table was created. The analyses used random-effects model. The primary outcome was pain reduction after treatment.
Eight articles were included. Only one study had low risk of bias. Quality of evidence was considered low or very low. Significant reduction in pain scores were found for fibromyalgia and KOA (Standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.94 [95% CI: -3.37 to -0.49; =76.4%] and SMD = -2.35 [95% CI: -3.63 to -1.06; =69.7%] respectively). Subgroup analysis considering the type of PTM despite MSK condition revealed significant reduction in pain scores for exercise, SMD = -1.20 [95% CI: -1.683 to -0.717; =10.8%].
Large heterogeneity and low quality of evidence and limited number of studies were found. Results suggest a potential analgesic effect of tDCS in combination with a PTM for fibromyalgia and KOA. Subgroup analysis suggests a stronger effect of tDCS when combined with an exercise based PTM.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合物理治疗的镇痛效果尚不清楚。
系统评价比较tDCS联合任何物理治疗方式(PTM)与单纯PTM或PTM联合假tDCS对常见肌肉骨骼(MSK)疾病(即膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)、慢性下腰痛(CLBP)、肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)和纤维肌痛)疼痛缓解的现有证据。
检索EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库,从建库至2019年4月,查找随机对照试验。评价者根据PRISMA方案独立评估研究质量并提取数据。采用GRADE方法评估证据质量,并创建了“结果总结”表。分析采用随机效应模型。主要结局是治疗后疼痛减轻。
纳入8篇文章。只有1项研究偏倚风险较低。证据质量被认为是低或极低。纤维肌痛和KOA的疼痛评分显著降低(标准化均数差(SMD)分别为-1.94 [95%CI:-3.37至-0.49; =76.4%]和SMD = -2.35 [95%CI:-3.63至-1.06; =69.7%])。尽管存在MSK疾病,但考虑PTM类型的亚组分析显示,运动组的疼痛评分显著降低,SMD = -1.20 [95%CI:-1.683至-0.717; =10.8%]。
发现存在较大异质性、证据质量低且研究数量有限。结果表明,tDCS联合PTM对纤维肌痛和KOA可能有镇痛作用。亚组分析表明,tDCS与基于运动的PTM联合使用时效果更强。