Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Aug 7;10(3):598-605. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz140.
Implementing a digital mental health service in primary care requires integration into clinic workflow. However, without adequate attention to service design, including designing referral pathways to identify and engage patients, implementation will fail. This article reports results from our efforts designing referral pathways for a randomized clinical trial evaluating a digital service for depression and anxiety delivered through primary care clinics. We utilized three referral pathways: direct to consumer (e.g., digital and print media, registry emails), provider referral (i.e., electronic health record [EHR] order and provider recommendation), and other approaches (e.g., presentations, word of mouth). Over the 5-month enrollment, 313 individuals completed the screen and reported how they learned about the study. Penetration was 13%, and direct to consumer techniques, most commonly email, had the highest yield. Providers only referred 16 patients through the EHR, half of whom initiated the screen. There were no differences in referral pathway based on participants' age, depression severity, or anxiety severity at screening. Ongoing discussions with providers revealed that the technologic implementation and workflow design may not have been optimal to fully affect the EHR-based referral process, which potentially limited patient access. Results highlight the importance of designing and evaluating referral pathways within service implementation, which is important for guiding the implementation of digital services into practice. Doing so can ensure that sustained implementation is not left to post-evaluation bridge-building. Future efforts should assess these and other referral pathways implemented in clinical practice outside of a research trial.
在初级保健中实施数字心理健康服务需要将其融入临床工作流程。然而,如果不充分关注服务设计,包括设计转诊途径以识别和接触患者,实施将会失败。本文报告了我们为一项通过初级保健诊所提供的数字服务评估抑郁和焦虑的随机临床试验设计转诊途径所做的努力。我们利用了三种转诊途径:直接面向消费者(例如,数字和印刷媒体、注册电子邮件)、提供者转诊(即电子健康记录 [EHR] 订单和提供者推荐)和其他途径(例如,演示、口碑)。在 5 个月的招募期间,313 人完成了筛选并报告了他们如何了解该研究。参与率为 13%,直接面向消费者的技术,最常见的是电子邮件,产生的效果最高。提供者仅通过 EHR 转诊了 16 名患者,其中一半人开始了筛选。在转诊途径方面,参与者的年龄、抑郁严重程度或筛选时的焦虑严重程度没有差异。与提供者的持续讨论表明,技术实现和工作流程设计可能没有达到最佳状态,无法完全影响基于 EHR 的转诊过程,这可能限制了患者的就诊机会。结果强调了在服务实施中设计和评估转诊途径的重要性,这对于指导数字服务在实践中的实施至关重要。这样做可以确保不会在评估后才开始进行艰难的搭桥工作。未来的努力应评估在临床试验之外的临床实践中实施的这些和其他转诊途径。