South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, 61 Glenburnie Road, London SW17 7DJ, UK.
39 Essex Chambers, London, UK; King's College London, UK.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;71:101572. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101572. Epub 2020 May 8.
Psychiatric inpatients are particularly vulnerable to the transmission and effects of COVID-19. As such, healthcare providers should implement measures to prevent its spread within mental health units, including adequate testing, cohorting, and in some cases, the isolation of patients. Respiratory isolation imposes a significant limitation on an individual's right to liberty, and should be accompanied by appropriate legal safeguards. This paper explores the implications of respiratory isolation in English law, considering the applicability of the common law doctrine of necessity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Mental Health Act 1983, and public health legislation. We then interrogate the practicality of currently available approaches by applying them to a series of hypothetical cases. There are currently no 'neat' or practicable solutions to the problem of lawfully isolating patients on mental health units, and we discuss the myriad issues with both mental health and public health law approaches to the problem. We conclude by making some suggestions to policymakers.
精神科住院患者特别容易受到 COVID-19 的传播和影响。因此,医疗保健提供者应采取措施防止其在精神卫生单位内传播,包括充分检测、分组和在某些情况下对患者进行隔离。呼吸道隔离对个人的自由权利构成重大限制,应附有适当的法律保障。本文探讨了呼吸道隔离在英国法律中的含义,考虑了普通法必要性原则、2005 年《精神能力法案》、1983 年《精神卫生法案》和公共卫生立法的适用性。然后,我们通过将其应用于一系列假设案例来审查当前可用方法的实用性。目前,对于在精神卫生病房内合法隔离患者的问题,没有“简单”或可行的解决方案,我们讨论了精神卫生和公共卫生法律方法在解决该问题方面存在的众多问题。最后,我们向政策制定者提出了一些建议。