Smędra Anna, Sidelnik Przemysław, Goryca Wojciech, Berent Jarosław
Military Institute of Armament Technology, Zielonka, Poland.
From the Chair and Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lodz.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2020 Dec;41(4):299-304. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000570.
This article presents the results of research relating to the ricocheting of hunting ammunition and the application of these results to the investigation of a specific gunshot death, which occurred during a hunt for boars. The scene and autopsy findings revealed that a bullet had first struck a pair of binoculars around the victim's neck before entering his body. As the investigation proceeded, however, questions were raised as to whether the shot was a direct one or a ricochet. The case was thus referred to forensic medicine experts for their opinion. Experiments were conducted, which demonstrated that, although test ammunition could ricochet, the rebound fragments possessed insufficient kinetic energy to pierce the binoculars. On the basis of the experiments, it was determined that the victim had been killed by a direct shot and that the bullet had pierced the intermediate target of the binoculars before entering his body. The possibility of a ricochet producing the injuries found, that is, the victim being struck with a bullet or fragments rebounding from an obstacle, was considered unlikely.
本文介绍了有关猎用弹药跳弹的研究结果,以及将这些结果应用于对一起特定野猪狩猎期间发生的枪击死亡案件的调查情况。现场和尸检结果显示,一颗子弹在进入受害者身体之前,首先击中了受害者颈部周围的一副双筒望远镜。然而,随着调查的进行,出现了关于这一枪击是直接射击还是跳弹的问题。因此,该案件被提交给法医学专家征求意见。进行了实验,结果表明,尽管测试弹药能够跳弹,但反弹碎片的动能不足以穿透双筒望远镜。基于这些实验,确定受害者是被直接枪击致死,子弹在进入他的身体之前穿透了双筒望远镜这一中间目标。由跳弹造成所发现损伤的可能性,即受害者被从障碍物反弹的子弹或碎片击中,被认为不太可能。