Suppr超能文献

评估的演进:纵向与发展性思维

The Evolution of Assessment: Thinking Longitudinally and Developmentally.

机构信息

E.S. Holmboe is chief, Research, Milestones Development and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois.

K. Yamazaki is senior analyst, Research, Milestones Development and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S7-S9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003649.

Abstract

Becoming a physician or other health care professional is a complex and intensely developmental process occurring over a prolonged period of time. The learning path for each medical student, resident, and fellow varies due to different individual learner abilities and curricular designs, clinical contexts, and assessments used by the training program. The slow and uneven evolution to outcomes-based medical education is partly the result of inadequate approaches to programmatic assessment that do not fully address all essential core competencies needed for practice or account for the developmental nature of training. Too many assessments in medical education still focus on single point-in-time performance or function as indirect proxies for actual performance in clinical care for patients and families.Milestones are a modest first step of providing predictive, longitudinal data on a national scale. Longitudinal Milestones data can facilitate the continuous improvement efforts of programs in assessment. However, Milestone judgments are only as good as the assessment data and group processes that inform them. Programmatic assessment should be longitudinally focused and provide all learners with comprehensive and actionable data to guide their professional development and support creation of meaningful individualized action plans. Efforts are urgently needed to rebalance programmatic assessment away from an overreliance on assessment proxies toward more effectively using developmentally focused work-based assessments, routinely incorporate clinical performance and patient experience data, and partner with learners through iterative coproduced assessment activities.

摘要

成为一名医生或其他医疗保健专业人员是一个复杂且高度发展的过程,需要长时间的积累。由于每个医学生、住院医师和研究员的个体学习能力、课程设计、临床环境和培训计划使用的评估方法不同,他们的学习路径也各不相同。基于结果的医学教育的缓慢和不均衡发展部分是由于对课程评估的方法不够完善,这些方法没有充分涵盖实践所需的所有核心基本能力,也没有考虑到培训的发展性质。太多的医学教育评估仍然集中在单一时间点的表现或作为临床护理中实际表现的间接替代指标。里程碑是在全国范围内提供预测性、纵向数据的一个适度的初步步骤。纵向里程碑数据可以促进评估方面的项目持续改进。然而,里程碑判断的质量取决于评估数据和告知判断的群体过程。课程评估应该具有纵向重点,并为所有学习者提供全面和可操作的数据,以指导他们的专业发展并支持创建有意义的个性化行动计划。迫切需要努力重新平衡课程评估,减少对评估替代指标的过度依赖,更多地使用以发展为重点的基于工作的评估,常规纳入临床绩效和患者体验数据,并通过迭代的共同评估活动与学习者合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验