University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Downtown Women's Healthcare, Denver, CO.
Menopause. 2020 Dec;27(12):1350-1356. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001621.
In the primary analysis of the phase 2b VESTA study, oral fezolinetant reduced frequency and severity of menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) compared with placebo. This secondary analysis evaluates effects of fezolinetant on responder rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
In this 12-week, double-blind study, postmenopausal women with moderate/severe VMS were randomized to fezolinetant 15, 30, 60, or 90 mg BID or 30, 60, or 120 mg QD or placebo. Proportion of responders was based on reductions in VMS from daily diary records. P values for comparisons between active treatment and placebo were calculated using logistic regression. Changes from baseline in PROs (Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire, Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale, Greene Climacteric Scale) were conducted using a mixed model for repeated measurements and compared post hoc with published minimally important differences (MIDs).
Of 356 women randomized, 352 were treated and analyzed. A greater proportion of women receiving fezolinetant versus placebo met definitions of response at week 12. For all doses, mean changes from baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire VMS scores exceeded the MID (1.2) at weeks 4 (placebo: -1.8; fezolinetant: range, -1.9 to -3.6) and 12 (placebo: -2.3; fezolinetant: range, -2.9 to -4.4). Mean changes in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale at weeks 4 (placebo: -2.2; fezolinetant: range, -2.5 to -3.8) and 12 (placebo: -2.9; fezolinetant: range, -3.3 to -4.3) exceeded the MID (1.76). Greene Climacteric Scale-VMS domain scores improved for most fezolinetant doses versus placebo (week 4, placebo: -1.7; fezolinetant: range, -2.1 to -3.3; week 12, placebo: -2.1; fezolinetant: range, -2.7 to -3.6).
Oral fezolinetant was associated with higher responder rates than placebo and larger improvements in QoL and other PRO measures, including a reduction in VMS-related interference with daily life.
在 VESTA 研究的 2b 期主要分析中,口服非甾体选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM) fezolinetant 与安慰剂相比,降低了绝经后血管舒缩症状(VMS)的发生频率和严重程度。本二次分析评估了 fezolinetant 对应答率和患者报告的结局(PROs)的影响。
在这项为期 12 周的双盲研究中,有中度/重度 VMS 的绝经后妇女被随机分配接受 fezolinetant 15、30、60 或 90mg BID 或 30、60 或 120mg QD 或安慰剂治疗。根据每日日记记录的 VMS 减少情况,评估应答者的比例。采用逻辑回归计算活性治疗与安慰剂之间比较的 P 值。使用重复测量混合模型对 PRO(绝经症状特异性生活质量问卷、热潮相关日常干扰量表、格林绝经量表)的变化进行比较,并与已发表的最小临床重要差异(MIDs)进行事后比较。
在 356 名随机分配的女性中,有 352 名女性接受了治疗并进行了分析。与安慰剂相比,接受 fezolinetant 治疗的女性符合应答定义的比例更高,在第 12 周。所有剂量组中,绝经症状特异性生活质量问卷 VMS 评分的基线变化均高于 MID(1.2),在第 4 周(安慰剂:-1.8;fezolinetant:范围,-1.9 至-3.6)和第 12 周(安慰剂:-2.3;fezolinetant:范围,-2.9 至-4.4)。在第 4 周(安慰剂:-2.2;fezolinetant:范围,-2.5 至-3.8)和第 12 周(安慰剂:-2.9;fezolinetant:范围,-3.3 至-4.3)时,热潮相关日常干扰量表的平均变化均高于 MID(1.76)。与安慰剂相比,大多数 fezolinetant 剂量组的格林绝经量表-VMS 域评分均有所改善(第 4 周,安慰剂:-1.7;fezolinetant:范围,-2.1 至-3.3;第 12 周,安慰剂:-2.1;fezolinetant:范围,-2.7 至-3.6)。
与安慰剂相比,口服 fezolinetant 与更高的应答率相关,并且对生活质量和其他 PRO 指标有更大的改善,包括降低与 VMS 相关的日常生活干扰。