University of Nottingham, School of Psychology, NottinghamNG7 2RD,
University of Toronto, Psychology UTMCCT4059, Mississauga, OntarioL5L1C6,
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43:e159. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000175.
Osiurak and Reynaud argue that children are not a good methodological choice to examine cumulative technological culture (CTC). However, the paper ignores other current work that suggests that young children do display some aspects of creative problem-solving. We argue that using multiple methodologies and examining how technical-reasoning develops in children will provide crucial support for a cognitive approach to CTC.
奥西拉克和雷纳德认为，儿童并不是考察累积技术文化（CTC）的好方法选择。然而，该论文忽略了其他一些当前研究，这些研究表明，幼儿确实表现出了创造性解决问题的某些方面。我们认为，使用多种方法并考察儿童的技术推理如何发展，将为 CTC 的认知方法提供重要支持。
