Suppr超能文献

不同呼吸机调整对心脏直视手术患者中心血流动力学的影响。

Effect of different respirator adjustments on central haemodynamics in open-heart surgery patients.

作者信息

Laaksonen V O, Arola M K, Inberg M V, Irjala J K, Kari A V

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(3):200-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01210.x.

Abstract

Changes in cardiac index (CI) mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary artery vascular resistance (PVR), associated with spontaneous respiration (SR) and two different types of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPPV and IPNPV) were studied in a total of 17 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or myocardial revascularization. Swan-Ganz thermodilution pulmonary artery cardiac output catheters were used and the aim was to determine: whether postoperative cardiac output may paradoxically be greater during IPPPV than during IPNPV or SR; whether the use of "negative" pressure in the expiratory phase during controlled ventilation may be responsible for bringing about the central haemodynamic conditions prevailing during spontaneous respiration; and whether, in weaning from postoperative IPPPV to SR, there is a risk of pulmonary congestion as a consequence of possible autotransfusion. IPPPV connected with anaesthesia induction caused a highly significant deterioration central haemodynamics. The use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not to be recommended for such patients at this stage. On the first postoperative day, the mean CI was lower during IPPPV than during IPNPV (P less than 0.1) or during SR (P less than 0.05). The changes observed in CI, were, however, so slight that the authors consider the routine use of PEEP to be beneficial during controlled ventilation following major open-heart surgery. In some patients, the CI was paradoxically higher during IPPPV than during IPNPV or SR. The mean CI was nearly the same during IPNPV (3.32) as during SR (3.38). However, PAP, PCWP and PVR values were significantly higher during SR than during IPNPV. Thus, according to this study, the use of "negative" end-expiratory pressure during controlled ventilation did not in these patients produce central pressure conditions corresponding to spontaneous respiration. The present study supports the finding that in weaning from controlled ventilation with PEEP to SR there is a danger of pulmonary congestion. This could be predicted by measurement of pulmonary wedge pressure, but not by measurement of central venous pressure.

摘要

对17例接受主动脉瓣置换术或心肌血运重建术的患者,研究了与自主呼吸(SR)以及两种不同类型的间歇性正压通气(IPPPV和IPNPV)相关的心脏指数(CI)、平均肺动脉压(PAP)、平均肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)、中心静脉压(CVP)和肺动脉血管阻力(PVR)的变化。使用Swan-Ganz热稀释肺动脉心输出量导管,目的是确定:术后心输出量在IPPPV期间是否可能反常地高于IPNPV或SR期间;在控制通气期间呼气阶段使用“负压”是否可能导致自主呼吸时存在的中心血流动力学状况;以及在从术后IPPPV撤机至SR时,是否存在因可能的自体输血而导致肺充血的风险。与麻醉诱导相关的IPPPV导致中心血流动力学显著恶化。在此阶段,不建议对此类患者使用呼气末正压(PEEP)。术后第一天,IPPPV期间的平均CI低于IPNPV期间(P<0.1)或SR期间(P<0.05)。然而,CI的变化非常轻微,作者认为在大型心脏直视手术后的控制通气期间常规使用PEEP是有益的。在一些患者中,IPPPV期间的CI反常地高于IPNPV或SR期间。IPNPV期间(3.32)的平均CI与SR期间(3.38)几乎相同。然而,SR期间的PAP、PCWP和PVR值显著高于IPNPV期间。因此,根据本研究,在控制通气期间使用“负压”呼气末压力并未在这些患者中产生与自主呼吸相对应的中心压力状况。本研究支持以下发现:从使用PEEP的控制通气撤机至SR时存在肺充血的危险。这可以通过测量肺楔压预测,但不能通过测量中心静脉压预测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验