Kunishige Tomoyuki, Takahashi Hiroshi
Department of Ophthalmology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 21;2020:2159363. doi: 10.1155/2020/2159363. eCollection 2020.
We examined the effects of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) and suction flow rates during phacoemulsification on the amount of ultrasound power used and damage to the corneal endothelium. In total, 48 eyes of 24 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion with different OVD settings in the left and right eye between February and August 2018 were examined retrospectively from medical records. Each of the following types of OVDs was used in either the right or left eye of each patient: a viscoadaptive OVD (V group) or a combination of dispersive and cohesive OVDs (soft-shell technique; S group). There was no significant difference in the lens nucleus hardness between the two groups. A 2.4 mm transconjunctival scleral incision was made, and phacoemulsification was performed by the same surgeon. The cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and ultrasound time intraoperatively were compared between the two groups. The CDE was significantly larger in the V group (9.9 ± 4.6) than the S group (6.4 ± 3.0; =0.006). The reduction rate of the endothelial cell density at the center of the cornea was significantly higher in the V group (4.1% ± 6.7%) than the S group (0.3% ± 4.5%; =0.03) at 1 week postoperatively. Both groups had a good postoperative course. There was less corneal endothelial damage with the soft-shell technique combined with a normal flow setting than the viscoadaptive OVD combined with a low flow setting.
我们研究了不同的眼科粘弹剂(OVDs)以及白内障超声乳化术中的抽吸流速对超声能量使用量和角膜内皮损伤的影响。回顾性分析了2018年2月至8月期间24例患者的48只眼,这些患者在双眼进行白内障超声乳化及人工晶状体植入术时,左右眼采用了不同的OVD设置。每位患者的右眼或左眼使用了以下每种类型的OVD:粘弹性OVD(V组)或分散性与粘性OVD的组合(软壳技术;S组)。两组之间晶状体核硬度无显著差异。制作一个2.4毫米的经结膜巩膜切口,由同一位外科医生进行白内障超声乳化术。比较两组术中的累积耗散能量(CDE)和超声时间。V组的CDE(9.9±4.6)显著高于S组(6.4±3.0;P = 0.006)。术后1周时,V组角膜中央内皮细胞密度的降低率(4.1%±6.7%)显著高于S组(0.3%±4.5%;P = 0.03)。两组术后过程均良好。与粘弹性OVD联合低流速设置相比,软壳技术联合正常流速设置对角膜内皮的损伤更小。