• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼科粘弹手术器械组合及抽吸流速对白内障超声乳化术中角膜内皮细胞损伤的影响

Effects of Combinations of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices and Suction Flow Rates on the Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Incurred during Phacoemulsification.

作者信息

Kunishige Tomoyuki, Takahashi Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 21;2020:2159363. doi: 10.1155/2020/2159363. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/2159363
PMID:32774899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7391086/
Abstract

We examined the effects of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) and suction flow rates during phacoemulsification on the amount of ultrasound power used and damage to the corneal endothelium. In total, 48 eyes of 24 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion with different OVD settings in the left and right eye between February and August 2018 were examined retrospectively from medical records. Each of the following types of OVDs was used in either the right or left eye of each patient: a viscoadaptive OVD (V group) or a combination of dispersive and cohesive OVDs (soft-shell technique; S group). There was no significant difference in the lens nucleus hardness between the two groups. A 2.4 mm transconjunctival scleral incision was made, and phacoemulsification was performed by the same surgeon. The cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and ultrasound time intraoperatively were compared between the two groups. The CDE was significantly larger in the V group (9.9 ± 4.6) than the S group (6.4 ± 3.0; =0.006). The reduction rate of the endothelial cell density at the center of the cornea was significantly higher in the V group (4.1% ± 6.7%) than the S group (0.3% ± 4.5%; =0.03) at 1 week postoperatively. Both groups had a good postoperative course. There was less corneal endothelial damage with the soft-shell technique combined with a normal flow setting than the viscoadaptive OVD combined with a low flow setting.

摘要

我们研究了不同的眼科粘弹剂(OVDs)以及白内障超声乳化术中的抽吸流速对超声能量使用量和角膜内皮损伤的影响。回顾性分析了2018年2月至8月期间24例患者的48只眼,这些患者在双眼进行白内障超声乳化及人工晶状体植入术时,左右眼采用了不同的OVD设置。每位患者的右眼或左眼使用了以下每种类型的OVD:粘弹性OVD(V组)或分散性与粘性OVD的组合(软壳技术;S组)。两组之间晶状体核硬度无显著差异。制作一个2.4毫米的经结膜巩膜切口,由同一位外科医生进行白内障超声乳化术。比较两组术中的累积耗散能量(CDE)和超声时间。V组的CDE(9.9±4.6)显著高于S组(6.4±3.0;P = 0.006)。术后1周时,V组角膜中央内皮细胞密度的降低率(4.1%±6.7%)显著高于S组(0.3%±4.5%;P = 0.03)。两组术后过程均良好。与粘弹性OVD联合低流速设置相比,软壳技术联合正常流速设置对角膜内皮的损伤更小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/481174786238/JOPH2020-2159363.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/fef19a43bc81/JOPH2020-2159363.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/a008c8d0604c/JOPH2020-2159363.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/481174786238/JOPH2020-2159363.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/fef19a43bc81/JOPH2020-2159363.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/a008c8d0604c/JOPH2020-2159363.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d1b/7391086/481174786238/JOPH2020-2159363.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Combinations of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices and Suction Flow Rates on the Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Incurred during Phacoemulsification.眼科粘弹手术器械组合及抽吸流速对白内障超声乳化术中角膜内皮细胞损伤的影响
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 21;2020:2159363. doi: 10.1155/2020/2159363. eCollection 2020.
2
Corneal endothelium protection provided by ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification: experimental study in rabbit eyes.白内障超声乳化术中眼科粘弹剂对角膜内皮的保护作用:兔眼实验研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1440-1445. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001052.
3
Corneal endothelial cell coating during phacoemulsification using a new dispersive hyaluronic acid ophthalmic viscosurgical device.使用新型分散型透明质酸眼科粘弹剂在白内障超声乳化手术期间进行角膜内皮细胞涂层处理
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1879-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
4
Soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Healon 5: a prospective, randomized comparison between a dispersive-viscoadaptive and a dispersive-cohesive soft-shell technique.使用维速达尔和海露5的软壳技术:弥散性粘弹性适应型与弥散性粘性结合型软壳技术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;86(1):65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01018.x. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
5
Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery.两种眼科粘弹剂在白内障手术中的性能与安全性比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.025.
6
Thickness of the Protective Layers of Different Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices During Lens Surgery in a Porcine Model.不同眼科粘弹手术设备在猪眼晶状体手术中保护层厚度。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):28. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.28.
7
Dispersive viscosurgical devices demonstrate greater efficacy in protecting corneal endothelium in vitro.分散式粘性手术器械在体外对角膜内皮的保护方面显示出更高的疗效。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 16;4(1):e000227. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000227. eCollection 2019.
8
Hydroimplantation versus viscoimplantation: comparison of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification.水凝胶植入术与黏弹剂植入术:白内障超声乳化术中使用与不使用眼科黏弹剂进行人工晶状体植入的比较
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct-Dec;62(4):282-287.
9
Quantitative assessment of ophthalmic viscosurgical device retention using in vivo confocal microscopy.使用体内共聚焦显微镜对眼科粘弹手术器械残留进行定量评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.05.032.
10
A Novel "Slit Side View" Method to Evaluate Fluid Dynamics during Phacoemulsification.一种用于评估白内障超声乳化术中流体动力学的新型“侧面观察”方法。
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 27;2018:5027238. doi: 10.1155/2018/5027238. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of anterior chamber stability with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device versus the soft-shell technique.使用粘性眼科粘弹剂与软壳技术对前房稳定性的比较分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06867-w.
2
Intraocular pressure before and after capsulorhexis using two viscoelastic substances and two surgical approaches in enucleated porcine eyes.在摘除的猪眼中,使用两种粘弹剂和两种手术方法进行撕囊前后的眼压情况。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 18;17(6):1156-1160. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.06.22. eCollection 2024.
3
A Shape Memory Polymeric Shield for Protecting Corneal Endothelium During Phacoemulsification.

本文引用的文献

1
The benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的优缺点。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;31(3):1021-1030. doi: 10.1177/1120672120922448. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
2
In vivo confocal microscopy: qualitative investigation of the conjunctival and corneal surface in open angle glaucomatous patients undergoing the XEN-Gel implant, trabeculectomy or medical therapy.活体共聚焦显微镜检查:对接受XEN凝胶植入术、小梁切除术或药物治疗的开角型青光眼患者结膜和角膜表面的定性研究。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Mar 10;7:15. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00181-8. eCollection 2020.
3
Intra and post-operative complications observed with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
一种用于在超声乳化过程中保护角膜内皮的形状记忆聚合物护罩。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 2;13(4):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.4.11.
4
Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.三种用于摘除致密白内障的超声乳化碎裂技术中的累积耗散能量
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 16;17:2405-2412. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S407705. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative anatomical outcomes of high-flow vs. low-flow phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量与低流量超声乳化白内障手术的比较解剖学结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:1021941. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1021941. eCollection 2022.
飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术术中及术后并发症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1190-2.
4
Intraoperative real-time image-guided ab externo canaloplasty.术中实时图像引导下外耳道外成形术。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Sep;33(9):1510-1513. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0447-6. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
5
A Novel "Slit Side View" Method to Evaluate Fluid Dynamics during Phacoemulsification.一种用于评估白内障超声乳化术中流体动力学的新型“侧面观察”方法。
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 27;2018:5027238. doi: 10.1155/2018/5027238. eCollection 2018.
6
Cataract surgery on post radial keratotomy patients.放射状角膜切开术后患者的白内障手术。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 18;10(7):1168-1170. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.23. eCollection 2017.
7
Corneal endothelial cell coating during phacoemulsification using a new dispersive hyaluronic acid ophthalmic viscosurgical device.使用新型分散型透明质酸眼科粘弹剂在白内障超声乳化手术期间进行角膜内皮细胞涂层处理
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1879-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
8
The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons.眼用粘弹剂在白内障手术中对内皮细胞丢失的保护作用:一项使用混合治疗比较的荟萃分析。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;95(1):5-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.158360. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
Effect of bottle height on the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification.注水瓶高度对白内障超声乳化术中角膜内皮的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Nov;35(11):2014-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.057.
10
DisCoVisc versus the soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Provisc in phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial.在白内障超声乳化术中,DisCoVisc与使用Viscoat和Provisc的软壳技术对比:随机临床试验
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jul;34(7):1145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.019.