Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.
Research Unit of Advanced Interdisciplinary Care Science, Osaka City University Graduate School of Human Life Science.
J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 5;31(10):530-536. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200185. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Previous research has established that women accumulate less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) than men. To date, however, little is known about the gender differences in device-based activity patterns of sedentary behavior (SB) and light-intensity physical activity (LPA). We aimed to compare time spent in SB and different intensities of physical activity taking into account of co-dependence of time use domains.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in Suttu town, Hokkaido, Japan. Data were analyzed from 634 Japanese adults (278 men, aged 19-92 years) who provided valid accelerometer (HJA-750C) data. Gender differences in activity behavior patterns were tested using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) based on isometric log-ratio transformations of time use, adjusting for age. We also developed bootstrap percentile confidence intervals (CI) to support the interpretation of which behavior differed between genders.
Overall, participants had percent time spent in SB, LPA, MVPA during wearing time (mean, 14.8 hours) corresponding to 53.9%, 41.7%, and 4.4% of wearing time, respectively. Activity behavior patterns differed significantly between genders after controlling for time spent in all activities. Women spent relatively 13.3% (95% CI, 9.9-15.9%) less time in SB and 19.8% (95% CI, 14.9-24.6%) more time in LPA compared to men. The difference of time spent in MVPA was not statistically significant.
In contrast with previous studies, our findings suggest that Japanese women are more physically active than men when all intensities of activities are considered. Given the health benefits of LPA, evaluating only MVPA may disproportionately underestimate the level of physical activity of women.
先前的研究已经证实,女性积累的中等到剧烈身体活动(MVPA)比男性少。然而,迄今为止,对于久坐行为(SB)和低强度身体活动(LPA)的基于设备的活动模式中的性别差异知之甚少。我们旨在考虑时间使用领域的共同依赖性,比较 SB 和不同强度的体力活动所花费的时间。
这项横断面研究在日本北海道的Suttu 镇进行。对提供有效加速度计(HJA-750C)数据的 634 名日本成年人(278 名男性,年龄 19-92 岁)进行了数据分析。使用基于等比对数变换的时间使用的多元协方差分析(MANCOVA)测试性别差异,调整了年龄。我们还开发了自举百分位置信区间(CI),以支持解释哪种行为在性别之间存在差异。
总体而言,参与者在佩戴时间(平均 14.8 小时)中分别有 53.9%、41.7%和 4.4%的时间处于 SB、LPA 和 MVPA 中。在控制所有活动时间后,男女之间的活动行为模式存在显著差异。与男性相比,女性在 SB 中花费的时间相对少 13.3%(95%CI,9.9-15.9%),在 LPA 中花费的时间多 19.8%(95%CI,14.9-24.6%)。MVPA 中花费的时间差异没有统计学意义。
与先前的研究不同,我们的研究结果表明,当考虑所有活动强度时,日本女性比男性更活跃。考虑到 LPA 的健康益处,仅评估 MVPA 可能会不成比例地低估女性的身体活动水平。