• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估放开南非药店所有权的影响。

To evaluate the impact of opening up ownership of pharmacies in South Africa.

作者信息

Moodley Rajatheran, Suleman Fatima

机构信息

Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, KZN 4000 South Africa.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Aug 7;13:28. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00232-4. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40545-020-00232-4
PMID:32782809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7412837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following the democratic elections in 1994 the South African private pharmaceutical services were mostly in metropolitan centred with a scattering of pharmacies in less densely populated areas. The Government introduced regulations relating to the ownership and licensing of pharmacies on the 25th of April 2003 to improve access to pharmaceutical services by removing ownership restriction to only pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of the policy implementation in improving access to pharmacies.

METHOD

The register of pharmacies at the South African Pharmacy Council was analysed from 1994 to 2014. Each registration was assigned GPS coordinates using Q-GIS(V3.6) and mapped per province at a district level, following clean-up and verification of the register. New registrations were also categorised as either corporate or independent pharmacy. Population census was obtained from Statistics South Africa and used to determine the number of pharmacies per 100,000 population.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of active pharmacies; Number of independent pharmacies; number of pharmacies in each district.

RESULTS

The number of active pharmacies increased from 1624 at the end of 2003 to 3021 by 2014. The closure rate decreased from 137 to 86 pharmacies per year post regulations, a 37.23% reduction with a net gain of approximately 127 pharmacies per year. About 38.30% of all pre-2003 pharmacies (622 of 1624) closed by 2014. The population increase in the study period was approximately 20.66% but the overall growth of pharmacies was only 1.88 pharmacies per 100,000 population (3.55 to 5.43). Following the regulations in 2004, 23.9% of pharmacies active within the system closed between 2004 and 2014, of which, 91.7% of them were independent pharmacies.

CONCLUSION

Opening up of pharmacy ownership in South Africa increased the number of pharmacies in the country but did not result in increased access in previously less populated areas. There was still clustering of pharmacies in a well resourced areas, with a steady growth in corporate pharmacy (35%) ownership.

摘要

背景

1994年民主选举后,南非的私营制药服务大多集中在大都市,人口密度较低地区仅有少数几家药店。2003年4月25日,政府出台了有关药店所有权和许可证的规定,通过取消仅允许药剂师拥有药店的限制来改善药品服务的可及性。

目的

评估该政策实施在改善药店可及性方面的效果。

方法

分析了1994年至2014年南非药房理事会的药店登记册。在对登记册进行清理和核实后,使用Q-GIS(V3.6)为每个登记信息分配GPS坐标,并按省份在地区层面进行绘制。新登记的药店也被归类为连锁药店或独立药店。从南非统计局获取人口普查数据,用于确定每10万人口的药店数量。

主要观察指标

活跃药店数量;独立药店数量;每个地区的药店数量。

结果

活跃药店数量从2003年底的1624家增加到2014年的3021家。法规实施后,药店关闭率从每年137家降至86家,下降了37.23%,每年净增约127家药店。到2014年,2003年前所有药店中的约38.30%(1624家中的622家)关闭。研究期间人口增长约20.66%,但药店的总体增长仅为每10万人口1.88家(从3.55家增至5.43家)。2004年实施相关规定后,2004年至2014年期间系统内活跃的药店中有23.9%关闭,其中91.7%为独立药店。

结论

南非放开药店所有权增加了该国的药店数量,但并未使此前人口较少地区的可及性得到提高。资源丰富地区仍存在药店聚集现象,连锁药店所有权稳步增长(35%)。

相似文献

1
To evaluate the impact of opening up ownership of pharmacies in South Africa.评估放开南非药店所有权的影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Aug 7;13:28. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00232-4. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessing equity in the geographical distribution of community pharmacies in South Africa in preparation for a national health insurance scheme.为国家医疗保险计划做准备,评估南非社区药房地理分布的公平性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jul 1;92(7):482-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.130005. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Exploring the impact of evolving health policy on independent pharmacy ownership in England.探索不断演变的卫生政策对英格兰独立药房所有权的影响。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Aug;32(4):488-95. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9395-8. Epub 2010 May 8.
4
The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership.2017 年意大利放宽对药店的监管:引入非药师所有权。
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1281-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Organisational and extraorganisational determinants of volume of service delivery by English community pharmacies: a cross-sectional survey and secondary data analysis.英国社区药房服务提供量的组织和组织外决定因素:一项横断面调查和二次数据分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 10;7(10):e017843. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017843.
6
The impact of face-to-face educational outreach on diarrhoea treatment in pharmacies.面对面教育推广对药店腹泻治疗的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Sep;11(3):308-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.308.
7
Pharmacy ownership in Canada: implications for the authority and autonomy of community pharmacy managers.加拿大的药房所有权:对社区药房经理的权力和自主权的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011 Dec;7(4):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
8
Mapping private pharmacies and their characteristics in Ujjain district, Central India.绘制印度中部乌贾因地区私营药店及其特征图。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 28;11:351. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-351.
9
The South African community pharmacy sector-an untapped reservoir for delivering HIV services.南非社区药房部门——提供艾滋病毒服务的未开发资源。
Front Reprod Health. 2023 Jul 14;5:1173576. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1173576. eCollection 2023.
10
Stakeholders' expectations and perceived effects of the pharmacy ownership liberalization reform in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.瑞典药房所有权自由化改革中利益相关者的期望及感知效果:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1637-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacists' Professional Satisfaction and Challenges: A Netnographic Analysis of Reddit and Facebook Discussions.药剂师的职业满意度与挑战:对Reddit和Facebook讨论的网络民族志分析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;12(5):155. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050155.
2
The South African community pharmacy sector-an untapped reservoir for delivering HIV services.南非社区药房部门——提供艾滋病毒服务的未开发资源。
Front Reprod Health. 2023 Jul 14;5:1173576. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1173576. eCollection 2023.
3
A Review on Pharmacy Practice in South Africa-A Higher Education Perspective.从高等教育视角看南非的药学实践综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11010003.

本文引用的文献

1
A spatial analysis to evaluate the impact of deregulation policies in the pharmacy sector: Evidence from the case of Navarre.一项空间分析评估了药房部门放松管制政策的影响:来自纳瓦拉案例的证据。
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1108-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
Health Care and Pharmacy Practice in South Africa.南非的医疗保健与药学实践。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jan-Feb;69(1):36-41. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i1.1521.
3
Reregulation of the Swedish pharmacy sector-A qualitative content analysis of the political rationale.瑞典药房行业的重新监管——对政治理由的定性内容分析
Health Policy. 2015 May;119(5):648-53. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
4
Assessing equity in the geographical distribution of community pharmacies in South Africa in preparation for a national health insurance scheme.为国家医疗保险计划做准备,评估南非社区药房地理分布的公平性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jul 1;92(7):482-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.130005. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries.社区药房的放松管制是否会影响药品可及性、药房服务质量和成本?来自九个欧洲国家的证据。
Health Policy. 2014 Sep;117(3):311-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
6
Black doctors and discrimination under South Africa's apartheid regime.南非种族隔离政权下的黑人医生与歧视
Med Hist. 2013 Apr;57(2):269-90. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2012.106.
7
Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis.欧洲国家应对全球金融危机的药品政策。
South Med Rev. 2011 Dec;4(2):69-79. doi: 10.5655/smr.v4i2.1004. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
8
Impact of regulation of Community Pharmacies on efficiency, access and equity. Evidence from the UK and Spain.社区药店监管对效率、可及性和公平性的影响。来自英国和西班牙的证据。
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):245-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.002. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
9
Deregulating the pharmacy market: the case of Iceland and Norway.放开药品市场:冰岛和挪威的案例。
Health Policy. 2005 Dec;75(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.020.
10
Rural health research: have we turned the corner?
Aust J Rural Health. 2000 Oct;8(5):249-53.