• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于热评价指标的客车车厢动态热环境实验研究。

Experimental study on dynamic thermal environment of passenger compartment based on thermal evaluation indexes.

机构信息

School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2020 Jul-Sep;103(3):36850420942991. doi: 10.1177/0036850420942991.

DOI:10.1177/0036850420942991
PMID:32787693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10451040/
Abstract

In this article, the thermal environment and the human thermal comfort of car cabin under different driving states in summer were studied experimentally. The weighted predictive mean vote model and the weighted equivalent temperature model were used for calculation and compared with the experimental values. The experimental results show that the air temperature and relative humidity distribution in cabin are affected by the space position and driving state. The temperature of the cabin seat, which is affected by solar radiation and crew, in the heating stage is slightly higher than the air temperature, while the cooling rate in the cooling stage is much lower than the air temperature. The predictive mean vote model and the equivalent temperature model are basically consistent with the actual thermal comfort of human body under the idle and driving conditions with the change of time. The prediction accuracy of the two models under the idle condition is higher than that under the driving condition, and the overall prediction accuracy of the equivalent temperature model is higher than that of the predictive mean vote model.

摘要

本文通过实验研究了夏季不同驾驶状态下汽车舱内热环境和人体热舒适性。采用了加权预测平均投票模型和加权等效温度模型进行计算,并与实验值进行了比较。实验结果表明,舱内空气温度和相对湿度的分布受空间位置和驾驶状态的影响。在加热阶段,受太阳辐射和乘员影响的座椅温度略高于空气温度,而在冷却阶段的冷却速率远低于空气温度。预测平均投票模型和等效温度模型基本与人体在空闲和驾驶状态下随时间变化的实际热舒适性一致。在空闲状态下,两个模型的预测精度均高于驾驶状态,等效温度模型的整体预测精度高于预测平均投票模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/20bb7836d406/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/441beabc9c94/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/a605c260d4ac/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/f4ccb9991dee/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/cb913e84bb40/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/87aede757190/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/5abcd5ff11cd/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/790493c99938/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/1639d2937a79/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/ea65a942fd7e/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/f24cd887303b/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/9e3d08022fc8/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/e73eda8fa9a0/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/01d8c808fe2a/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/e6646c2b137a/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/8567f742d140/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/9c24e6708ea8/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/92afa6e3363c/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/20bb7836d406/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/441beabc9c94/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/a605c260d4ac/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/f4ccb9991dee/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/cb913e84bb40/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/87aede757190/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/5abcd5ff11cd/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/790493c99938/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/1639d2937a79/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/ea65a942fd7e/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/f24cd887303b/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/9e3d08022fc8/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/e73eda8fa9a0/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/01d8c808fe2a/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/e6646c2b137a/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/8567f742d140/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/9c24e6708ea8/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/92afa6e3363c/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ee/10451040/20bb7836d406/10.1177_0036850420942991-fig18.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental study on dynamic thermal environment of passenger compartment based on thermal evaluation indexes.基于热评价指标的客车车厢动态热环境实验研究。
Sci Prog. 2020 Jul-Sep;103(3):36850420942991. doi: 10.1177/0036850420942991.
2
[Evaluation of thermal environment and human thermal comfort in 8 types of public places from 2019 to 2021].2019年至2021年8类公共场所热环境与人体热舒适性评价
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 20;41(3):189-197. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20220428-00229.
3
A correlation linking the predicted mean vote and the mean thermal vote based on an investigation on the human thermal comfort in short-haul domestic flights.基于对短途国内航班上人体热舒适度的调查,将预测平均投票与平均热投票联系起来的一种相关性。
Appl Ergon. 2015 May;48:202-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
4
Thermal aspects of vehicle comfort.
Appl Human Sci. 1995 Jul;14(4):159-65. doi: 10.2114/ahs.14.159.
5
Comparison of thermal comfort performance of two different types of road vehicle climate control systems.两种不同类型道路车辆气候控制系统的热舒适性能比较。
Ergonomics. 2007 Mar;50(3):364-78. doi: 10.1080/00140130601049337.
6
Smart heating panels to increase thermal comfort and efficiency.智能加热面板,提升热舒适度和效率。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S29-S35. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208003.
7
Experiments and CFD simulation of an air-conditioned tractor cabin for thermal comfort of tractor operators in Pakistan.巴基斯坦用于拖拉机操作员热舒适性的空调拖拉机驾驶室的实验与计算流体动力学模拟
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 29;9(12):e23038. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23038. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
A Physiological-Signal-Based Thermal Sensation Model for Indoor Environment Thermal Comfort Evaluation.基于生理信号的室内环境热舒适评价热感觉模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127292.
9
Appraisal of thermal comfort in rural household kitchens of Punjab, India and adaptation strategies for better health.评估印度旁遮普邦农村家庭厨房的热舒适度和改善健康的适应策略。
Environ Int. 2019 Mar;124:431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.059. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
An investigation of thermal comfort inside an automobile during the heating period.汽车供暖期车内热舒适性的调查。
Appl Ergon. 2005 May;36(3):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.006.