• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜剥离术治疗早期食管胃前病变的临床效果回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of the clinical effects of endoscopic mucosal dissection on treatment of early esophagogastric precancerous lesions.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Jinshan Branch of the Sixth People's Hospital, Health Road No. 147, Zhujing Town, Jinshan District, Shanghai, 201500, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Apr;23(4):731-737. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02462-z. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12094-020-02462-z
PMID:32789667
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective study about the clinical effects of endoscopic mucosal dissection on the treatment of early esophagogastric precancerous lesions.

METHODS

A total of 132 patients with early esophagogastric precancerous lesions who were diagnosed and treated with concurrent surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) group (n = 58) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group (n = 74) according to different surgical methods. The data in the two groups were compared and analyzed in terms of surgical indicators, treatment status and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the whole block cutting rate, fractional cutting rate and complete cutting rate (P < 0.05). The mean operation time of ESD group was significantly longer than that of EMR group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding rate, blood loss, average specimen area, length of hospital stay and treatment cost between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence and recurrence of postoperative complications, including bleeding, perforation and stenosis in the two groups, were observed within 1 year of postoperative follow-up. The incidence of complications in ESD group was slightly higher than that in EMR group, and the local recurrence rate in ESD group was lower than that in EMR group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ESD is an alternative surgical treatment for patients with early esophagogastric precancerous lesions.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在对内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管胃前病变的临床效果进行回顾性研究。

方法

回顾性分析 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在我院经手术同步诊断并治疗的 132 例早期食管胃前病变患者的临床资料,根据手术方法的不同将患者分为内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)组(n=58)和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)组(n=74)。比较两组患者的手术指标、治疗情况及术后并发症发生情况。

结果

两组整块切除率、分片切除率、完整切除率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ESD 组手术时间明显长于 EMR 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、术中出血量、平均标本面积、住院时间及治疗费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后 1 年内随访观察两组患者的出血、穿孔及狭窄等并发症的发生及复发情况,ESD 组并发症发生率略高于 EMR 组,ESD 组局部复发率低于 EMR 组,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

ESD 是治疗早期食管胃前病变的一种可选手术治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of the clinical effects of endoscopic mucosal dissection on treatment of early esophagogastric precancerous lesions.内镜黏膜剥离术治疗早期食管胃前病变的临床效果回顾性分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Apr;23(4):731-737. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02462-z. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
2
Clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌及癌前病变的临床疗效
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Jan;14(1):52-56. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_805_17.
3
Long-term outcomes of superficial neoplasia at the esophagogastric junction treated via endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a cohort study of a single center from China.中国单中心队列研究:经内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗的食管胃交界部表浅肿瘤的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):216-225. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06753-7. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
Snare combined with endoclips in endoscopic submucosal dissection with mucosal traction for gastroesophageal neoplasia.圈套器联合黏膜提拉在食管胃黏膜下肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1049-1057. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14561. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.早期胃癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术的Meta分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e025803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025803.
6
Comparison of MBM and ESD in the Treatment of Single Early Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions.对比黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与经内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗单发早期食管癌及癌前病变。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):534-541. doi: 10.62713/aic.3416.
7
Combining endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection to treat neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.联合内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜切除术治疗巴雷特食管肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5330-5337. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4885-y. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Comparison of the clinical and prognosis risk factors between endoscopic resection and radical gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer.比较内镜下切除与根治性胃切除术治疗早期胃癌的临床和预后危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 12;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03018-5.
9
[The value of endoscopic mucosal resection for dysplasia and early-stage cancer of the esophagus and gastric cardia].[内镜黏膜切除术治疗食管及贲门发育异常和早期癌的价值]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 Nov;30(11):853-7.
10
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.

引用本文的文献

1
The application effect of rubber band traction assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal precancerous lesions.橡皮筋牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管癌前病变的应用效果
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jun;41(6):1683-1688. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.6.12168.
2
Short-term efficacy of additional laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗早期胃癌后附加腹腔镜辅助根治性胃切除术的短期疗效。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 12;408(1):354. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03085-y.
3
Nomogram for preoperative estimation of histologic grade in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

本文引用的文献

1
[Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a transpyloric early gastric cáncer. A case report and literature review].[经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗经幽门早期胃癌。病例报告及文献复习]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2018 Jan-Mar;38(1):72-77.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for type 0-II superficial gastric lesions larger than 20 mm.对于直径大于20mm的0-II型浅表性胃病变,内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术的比较。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):338-343. doi: 10.20524/aog.2018.0237. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
Patterns of tobacco use in patients with upper aero digestive tract cancers: A hospital-based study.
用于术前预测胃肠道神经内分泌肿瘤组织学分级的列线图。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 24;13:991773. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.991773. eCollection 2022.
上呼吸消化道癌症患者的烟草使用模式:一项基于医院的研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(2):437-440. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.199459.
4
Metachronous Neoplasia and Local Recurrence after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Acta Med Okayama. 2017 Dec;71(6):475-483. doi: 10.18926/AMO/55584.
5
[Incidence and treatment of complications observed after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial digestive tumours in a regional general hospital].[地区综合医院浅表消化肿瘤内镜黏膜切除术后观察到的并发症的发生率及治疗情况]
Rev Med Liege. 2017 Dec;72(12):534-539.
6
[Selection and appraisal of digestive tract reconstruction after totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[腹腔镜全胃切除术后消化道重建方式的选择与评价]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;20(10):1113-1116.
7
[Prevention and treatment of complications related to the digestive tract reconstruction in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):156-159.
8
[Clinical research of delta-shaped anastomosis technology in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction].[三角吻合技术在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建中的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;20(1):73-78.