Tang Sanqi, Li Yuhui, Huang Chengming, Yan Shufa, Li Yongtai, Chen Zening, Wu Zhengjun
Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin, China.
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 17;13:897923. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.897923. eCollection 2022.
Captive animals and wild animals may exhibit different characteristics due to the heterogeneity of their living environments. The gut microbiota play an important role in the digestion and absorption, energy metabolism, immune regulation, and physiological health of the host. However, information about the gut microbiota of captive and wild is currently limited. To determine the difference in gut microbiota community composition, diversity, and structure between captive and wild geckos, we used the Illumina miseq platform to conduct high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of the v3-v4 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA in 54 gecko samples. Our results showed that Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the dominant gut microbiota phyla of the gecko. The dominant genera comprised mainly , , , , and . Captive geckos had significantly higher alpha diversity and potential pathogenic bacteria than wild populations. Moreover, significant differences in beta diversity of gut microbiota were observed between two populations. Functional prediction analysis showed that the relative abundance of functional pathways of wild geckos was more higher in metabolism, genetic information processing and organismal system function than those in captive geckos. Total length significantly affected gut microbial community (R = 0.4527, = 0.001) and explained 10.45% of the total variation for gut microbial community variance between two groups. These results may be related to differences in diet and living environment between two populations, suggesting that the management of captive populations should mimic wild environments to the greatest extent possible to reduce the impact on their gut microbiota.
圈养动物和野生动物可能因其生活环境的异质性而表现出不同的特征。肠道微生物群在宿主的消化吸收、能量代谢、免疫调节和生理健康中发挥着重要作用。然而,目前关于圈养动物和野生动物肠道微生物群的信息有限。为了确定圈养壁虎和野生壁虎肠道微生物群的群落组成、多样性和结构差异,我们使用Illumina miseq平台对54个壁虎样本的16S rRNA的v3 - v4高变区进行了高通量测序和生物信息学分析。我们的结果表明,变形菌门、厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门和放线菌门是壁虎肠道微生物群的主要门类。优势属主要包括 、 、 、 和 。圈养壁虎的α多样性和潜在病原菌显著高于野生种群。此外,在两个种群之间观察到肠道微生物群的β多样性存在显著差异。功能预测分析表明,野生壁虎在代谢、遗传信息处理和机体系统功能方面的功能途径相对丰度高于圈养壁虎。体长显著影响肠道微生物群落(R = 0.4527, = 0.001),并解释了两组之间肠道微生物群落变异总方差的10.45%。这些结果可能与两个种群的饮食和生活环境差异有关,表明圈养种群的管理应尽可能模仿野生环境,以减少对其肠道微生物群的影响。