Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Nature. 2022 Jul;607(7917):142-148. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04866-z. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
The divergence of the common dendritic cell progenitor (CDP) into the conventional type 1 and type 2 dendritic cell (cDC1 and cDC2, respectively) lineages is poorly understood. Some transcription factors act in the commitment of already specified progenitors-such as BATF3, which stabilizes Irf8 autoactivation at the +32 kb Irf8 enhancer-but the mechanisms controlling the initial divergence of CDPs remain unknown. Here we report the transcriptional basis of CDP divergence and describe the first requirements for pre-cDC2 specification. Genetic epistasis analysis suggested that Nfil3 acts upstream of Id2, Batf3 and Zeb2 in cDC1 development but did not reveal its mechanism or targets. Analysis of newly generated NFIL3 reporter mice showed extremely transient NFIL3 expression during cDC1 specification. CUT&RUN and chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing identified endogenous NFIL3 binding in the -165 kb Zeb2 enhancer at three sites that also bind the CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins C/EBPα and C/EBPβ. In vivo mutational analysis using CRISPR-Cas9 targeting showed that these NFIL3-C/EBP sites are functionally redundant, with C/EBPs supporting and NFIL3 repressing Zeb2 expression at these sites. A triple mutation of all three NFIL3-C/EBP sites ablated Zeb2 expression in myeloid, but not lymphoid progenitors, causing the complete loss of pre-cDC2 specification and mature cDC2 development in vivo. These mice did not generate T helper 2 (T2) cell responses against Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection, consistent with cDC2 supporting T2 responses to helminths. Thus, CDP divergence into cDC1 or cDC2 is controlled by competition between NFIL3 and C/EBPs at the -165 kb Zeb2 enhancer.
CDP 向传统的 1 型和 2 型树突状细胞(cDC1 和 cDC2)谱系的分化尚不清楚。一些转录因子作用于已经指定的祖细胞的承诺,例如 BATF3,它稳定 Irf8 自动激活在 +32 kb Irf8 增强子,但控制 CDP 最初分化的机制仍然未知。在这里,我们报告了 CDP 分化的转录基础,并描述了 pre-cDC2 规范的第一个要求。遗传上位性分析表明,Nfil3 在 cDC1 发育中作用于 Id2、Batf3 和 Zeb2 的上游,但没有揭示其机制或靶点。对新生成的 NFIL3 报告小鼠的分析表明,在 cDC1 规范期间,NFIL3 表达极其短暂。CUT&RUN 和染色质免疫沉淀 followed by sequencing 在三个位点鉴定了内源性 NFIL3 结合,这些位点也结合 CCAAT 增强子结合蛋白 C/EBPα 和 C/EBPβ。使用 CRISPR-Cas9 靶向的体内突变分析表明,这些 NFIL3-C/EBP 位点是功能冗余的,C/EBPs 支持和 NFIL3 抑制这些位点的 Zeb2 表达。所有三个 NFIL3-C/EBP 位点的三重突变在髓样祖细胞中但不在淋巴祖细胞中消除了 Zeb2 的表达,导致体内 pre-cDC2 规范和成熟 cDC2 发育的完全丧失。这些小鼠在体内没有产生针对 Heligmosomoides polygyrus 感染的 T 辅助 2(T2)细胞反应,这与 cDC2 支持对蠕虫的 T2 反应一致。因此,CDP 向 cDC1 或 cDC2 的分化受 -165 kb Zeb2 增强子处 NFIL3 和 C/EBPs 之间的竞争控制。