• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全自动化学发光免疫分析法在 COVID-19 患者定量抗体检测中的临床应用价值。

Clinical usefulness of fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for quantitative antibody measurements in COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Scientific Research Pole of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1465-1477. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26430. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1002/jmv.26430
PMID:32797641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7436871/
Abstract

Since December 2019, we have been in the battlefield with a new threat to the humanity, known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), characterized by viral pneumonia. It may be asymptomatic or cause various symptoms, ranging from flu-like symptoms to acute respiratory distress syndrome and eventually death. At present, the only reliable test for COVID-19 diagnosis is quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Assessing the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 could increase the detection sensitivity of infected population. Hereby, we report the performances of a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) on 276 serum samples. One hundred samples obtained from COVID-19 negative subjects (COVID-19 free) were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic specificity of antibody (Ab) detection. Thereafter, 176 samples obtained from 125 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-19 patients) were selected to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of the CLIA. All samples were analyzed on MAGLUMI 800 platform. All COVID-19 free samples had Ab levels below the cutoff values. Hence, the diagnostic specificity was estimated at 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 96.3-100.0; positive predictive value = 100%). By the 18th day from the onset of symptoms, we reached an optimal diagnostic sensitivity (more than 95.0%) In fact, the diagnostic sensitivity increased over time and between 15 and 25 days after symptoms onset, reached 95.5% (95% CI = 84.9-99.2). The new automated CLIA analyzer appeared to be a robust and reliable method to measure specific Ab against COVID-19 at high throughput. Our data suggest that combining Ab and nucleic acid detection could increase diagnostic sensitivity.

摘要

自 2019 年 12 月以来,我们一直在与一种新的人类威胁作斗争,这种威胁被称为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2),它会导致 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),其特征是病毒性肺炎。它可能是无症状的,也可能导致各种症状,从流感样症状到急性呼吸窘迫综合征,最终导致死亡。目前,COVID-19 诊断的唯一可靠检测方法是定量逆转录-聚合酶链反应。评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫反应可以提高感染人群的检测灵敏度。在此,我们报告了一种全自动化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)在 276 份血清样本上的性能。分析了 100 份来自 COVID-19 阴性受试者(COVID-19 阴性)的样本,以评估抗体(Ab)检测的诊断特异性。此后,选择了 176 份来自 125 名确诊 COVID-19 患者(COVID-19 患者)的样本,以评估 CLIA 的诊断敏感性。所有样本均在 MAGLUMI 800 平台上进行分析。所有 COVID-19 阴性样本的 Ab 水平均低于截止值。因此,诊断特异性估计为 100%(95%置信区间[CI] = 96.3-100.0;阳性预测值= 100%)。从症状出现后的第 18 天,我们达到了最佳的诊断敏感性(超过 95.0%)。事实上,诊断敏感性随着时间的推移而增加,在症状出现后 15 至 25 天之间,达到 95.5%(95% CI = 84.9-99.2)。新的自动化 CLIA 分析仪似乎是一种强大且可靠的方法,可以高通量测量针对 COVID-19 的特异性 Ab。我们的数据表明,将 Ab 和核酸检测相结合可以提高诊断敏感性。

相似文献

1
Clinical usefulness of fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for quantitative antibody measurements in COVID-19 patients.全自动化学发光免疫分析法在 COVID-19 患者定量抗体检测中的临床应用价值。
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1465-1477. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26430. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: an Italian experience.一种自动化化学发光免疫分析检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的诊断准确性:意大利经验。
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1671-1675. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25932. Epub 2020 May 10.
3
Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan.日本一种新型自动化化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体检测系统的验证,该系统可同时检测N蛋白和S蛋白。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247711. eCollection 2021.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血清学检测的诊断准确性和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 抗体的动力学:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Med Virol. 2021 May;31(3):e2181. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2181. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Development, performance evaluation, and clinical application of a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Test Kit based on automated fluorescence immunoassay.基于自动化荧光免疫分析的快速 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 检测试剂盒的开发、性能评估和临床应用。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2838-2847. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26696. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Serological evaluation of patients with coronavirus disease-2019 in Daegu, South Korea.韩国大邱市 2019 年冠状病毒病患者的血清学评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0262820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262820. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay.使用自动化化学发光检测法的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 和 IgM 检测的临床性能。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Apr;41(2):318-322. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2349-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Performance characteristics of five SARS-CoV-2 serological assays: Clinical utility in health-care workers.五种 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能特征:在医护人员中的临床应用价值。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/00045632211012728. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies via rapid diagnostic immunoassays in COVID-19 patients.通过快速诊断免疫分析检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体。
Virol J. 2021 Mar 9;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01530-2.
10
Validation and performance comparison of three SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays.三种 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂盒的验证和性能比较。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):916-923. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26341. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic challenges for severe infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pregnancy: a case report.妊娠期严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型严重感染的诊断挑战:一例病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2025 Jul 25;19(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05410-z.
2
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy Tests of COVID-19.一项比较新冠病毒病诊断准确性测试的系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;13(9):1549. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091549.
4
Microfluidic-based technologies for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of COVID-19: recent advances and future directions.基于微流控技术的 COVID-19 诊断、预防和治疗:最新进展和未来方向。
Biomed Microdevices. 2023 Mar 13;25(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10544-023-00649-z.
5
Multiplexed evaluation of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants using surface enhanced fluorescence from a nanostructured plasmonic chip.利用纳米结构等离子体芯片的表面增强荧光对 SARS-CoV-2 变体的免疫进行多重评估。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2022 Dec 15;20(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01687-0.
6
Portable high-throughput multimodal immunoassay platform for rapid on-site COVID-19 diagnostics.便携式高通量多模态免疫分析平台,用于快速现场 COVID-19 诊断。
Anal Chim Acta. 2023 Jan 15;1238:340634. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340634. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
7
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
8
Recent Advances in CRISPR/Cas-Based Biosensors for Protein Detection.基于CRISPR/Cas的蛋白质检测生物传感器的最新进展
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;9(10):512. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100512.
9
Correlation between In Vitro Neutralization Assay and Serological Tests for Protective Antibodies Detection.体外中和测定与血清学试验检测保护性抗体的相关性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 24;23(17):9566. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179566.
10
Head-to-Head Comparison of 5 Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assays Performance in One Hundred COVID-19 Vaccinees, over an 8-Month Course.在100名COVID-19疫苗接种者中,对5种抗SARS-CoV-2检测方法的性能进行为期8个月的直接比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;12(6):1426. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061426.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of two automated and three rapid lateral flow immunoassays for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.评价两种自动化和三种快速侧向流动免疫测定法用于检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104413. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Assessment of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 with fully automated MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG and IgM chemiluminescence immunoassays.使用全自动 MAGLUMI 2019 - nCoV IgG 和 IgM 化学发光免疫分析法评估对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫反应。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1156-1159. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0473.
3
Analytical performances of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and antibody kinetics.用于 SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 的化学发光免疫分析的分析性能和抗体动力学。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1081-1088. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0443.
4
Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.药物治疗 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19):综述。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1824-1836. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6019.
5
Vademecum for the treatment of people with COVID-19. Edition 2.0, 13 March 2020.《2019冠状病毒病患者治疗手册》。第2.0版,2020年3月13日。
Infez Med. 2020;28(2):143-152.
6
Current Drugs with Potential for Treatment of COVID-19: A Literature Review.当前具有治疗新冠病毒病潜力的药物:文献综述
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2020;23(1):58-64. doi: 10.18433/jpps31002.
7
Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.新型冠状病毒病 2019 患者的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2027-2034. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344.
8
Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study.113 例新冠肺炎死亡患者的临床特征:回顾性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1091.
9
Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes.2019-nCoV 感染患者的分子和血清学调查:多种脱落途径的意义。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Feb 17;9(1):386-389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071. eCollection 2020.
10
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.《武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎 138 例住院患者临床特征分析》
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.