• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能特征:在医护人员中的临床应用价值。

Performance characteristics of five SARS-CoV-2 serological assays: Clinical utility in health-care workers.

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/00045632211012728. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1177/00045632211012728
PMID:33845592
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

SARS-CoV-2, which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19), continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of acute infection relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based viral detection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optimal serological testing strategy for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies which provides an important indicator of prior infection and potential short-term immunity.

METHODS

The sensitivity and specificity of four different ELISA assays (Euroimmun IgG, Euroimmun NCP-IgG, Fortress and DIAsource) and one CLIA assay (Roche ELECSYS) were evaluated in 423 samples; 137 patients with confirmed RT-PCR COVID-19 infection (true positives), and 100 pre-pandemic samples collected prior to October 2019 (true negatives). A further 186 samples were collected from health-care staff and analysed by all five assays.

RESULTS

The Fortress ELISA assay demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity followed by the Roche ECLIA assay. The highest overall sensitivity came from the assays that measured total antibody (IgM-IgG combined) and the three assays that performed the best (Fortress, Roche, Euroimmun IgG) all have different antigens as their target proteins which suggests that antigen target does not affect assay performance. In mildly symptomatic participants with either a negative RT-PCR or no RT-PCR performed, 16.76% had detectable antibodies suggesting previous infection.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a combined testing strategy utilizing assays with different antigenic targets using the fully automated Roche ECLIA assay and confirming discordant samples with the Fortress Total Antibody ELISA assay. This study provides an important indicator of prior infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

摘要

研究目的

导致冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的 SARS-CoV-2 继续导致严重的发病率和死亡率。急性感染的诊断依赖于基于逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的病毒检测。本研究的目的是评估抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的最佳血清学检测策略,该策略提供了先前感染和潜在短期免疫的重要指标。

方法

在 423 份样本中评估了四种不同 ELISA 检测(Euroimmun IgG、Euroimmun NCP-IgG、Fortress 和 DIAsource)和一种 CLIA 检测(罗氏 ELECSYS)的敏感性和特异性;137 例经证实的 RT-PCR COVID-19 感染患者(真阳性)和 100 例 2019 年 10 月前采集的大流行前样本(真阴性)。另外 186 份样本来自医护人员,并用所有五种检测方法进行分析。

结果

Fortress ELISA 检测显示出最高的敏感性和特异性,其次是罗氏 ECLIA 检测。总抗体(IgM-IgG 联合)检测的三个检测(Fortress、罗氏、Euroimmun IgG)的总体敏感性最高,表现最好的三个检测(Fortress、罗氏、Euroimmun IgG)都有不同的抗原作为其靶蛋白,这表明抗原靶标不会影响检测性能。在有阴性 RT-PCR 或未进行 RT-PCR 的轻度症状参与者中,有 16.76%的人检测到抗体,提示先前感染。

结论

我们建议采用不同抗原靶标的联合检测策略,使用全自动罗氏 ECLIA 检测,并用 Fortress 总抗体 ELISA 检测确认不一致的样本。本研究为有症状和无症状个体的先前感染提供了重要指标。

相似文献

1
Performance characteristics of five SARS-CoV-2 serological assays: Clinical utility in health-care workers.五种 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能特征:在医护人员中的临床应用价值。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/00045632211012728. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Serological Assays for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19.新型冠状病毒血清学检测方法在 SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 诊断中的研究进展。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;8:620222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.620222. eCollection 2020.
3
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在医护人员中的应用:三种市售抗体检测试剂盒的临床性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Comparison of six commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays-Choice of assay depends on intended use.六种市售 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂盒的比较——检测试剂盒的选择取决于预期用途。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.017. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Diagnostic performance of four SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in patients with COVID-19 or with bacterial and non-SARS-CoV-2 viral respiratory infections.四种 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂在 COVID-19 患者及细菌性和非 SARS-CoV-2 病毒呼吸道感染患者中的诊断性能比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;40(9):1983-1997. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04285-4. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID-19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.酶联免疫吸附试验评价 COVID-19 患者血清 IgM 和 IgG 抗体。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2857-2866. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26741. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
7
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of the Abbott Alinity IgG, Abbott Architect IgM, and Roche Elecsys Total SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays.雅培 Alinity IgG、雅培 Architect IgM 和罗氏 Elecsys 总 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂的临床性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02104-20.
8
Serological Assays for Assessing Postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response.用于评估接种后 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应的血清学检测方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0073321. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00733-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan.日本一种新型自动化化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体检测系统的验证,该系统可同时检测N蛋白和S蛋白。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247711. eCollection 2021.
10
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Qualitative Immunoglobulin G Assays: The Value of Numeric Reporting.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)定性免疫球蛋白 G 检测:数值报告的价值。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Aug 1;145(8):929-936. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0851-SA.

引用本文的文献

1
An Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for Seven Different SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.七种不同的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测诊断准确性的间接比较:诊断试验准确性的荟萃分析和调整后的间接比较
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025 Sep;19(9):e70155. doi: 10.1111/irv.70155.
2
Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in a healthcare worker cohort utilising the Abbott Alinity® anti-nucleocapsid assay.使用雅培Alinity®抗核衣壳检测法对一组医护人员进行的SARS-CoV-2抗体纵向反应研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0325544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325544. eCollection 2025.
3
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
4
Assessment of Reactivity to the Administration of the mRNA Vaccine after Six Months of Observation.六个月观察期后对mRNA疫苗接种反应性的评估。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;11(2):366. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020366.
5
Performance Characteristics of High-Throughput Serologic Assays for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 with Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization: A Review.经美国食品和药物管理局紧急使用授权的高通量血清学检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的性能特征:综述。
Clin Lab Med. 2022 Mar;42(1):15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
6
Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 adenovirus vector vaccination (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AZD1222]) in heart transplant recipients aged 18 to 70 years of age.18 至 70 岁心脏移植受者对 SARS-CoV-2 腺病毒载体疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AZD1222])的体液免疫反应。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Apr;41(4):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiological investigation among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Germany.德国一家三级保健医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行病学的纵向研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 24;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07057-3.