Suppr超能文献

奥瑞珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的安全性:系统评价。

Safety profile of ocrelizumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology and the Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada.

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;19(9):1069-1094. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1807002. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We systematically reviewed adverse events (AEs) for ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis (MS).

AREAS COVERED

We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Toxicology Data Network-TOXLINE (inception to 8-July-2020), clinical trial registries, and product monographs for any clinical trials, observational studies or case reports examining AEs to ocrelizumab. Studies with/without a comparator drug or placebo were eligible.

EXPERT OPINION

Seventy-eight records were included (4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4 open-label trials, 29 observational studies, and 27 case reports). AEs affected 2756/4498 (61.3%) of ocrelizumab-exposed patients. The most common AEs were infections (n=1342, 39.2% of ocrelizumab-exposed patients) and infusion-related reactions (n=1391, 26.2%). Compared to beta-interferon, infections were more likely in ocrelizumab-exposed patients (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01-1.19), including: herpes-related (RR=1.75; 95%CI:1.11-2.76), respiratory tract-related (RR=1.42; 95%CI:1.10-1.84 and RR=1.61; 95%CI:1.10-2.35), nasopharyngitis (RR=1.47; 95%CI:1.13-1.90), and rhinitis (RR=4.00; 95%CI:1.13-14.14). Infusion-related reactions (RR range: 1.57-4.42) were more common for ocrelizumab versus placebo or beta-interferon. From pooled analyses (three RCTs), the risk of 'any' serious AE did not differ significantly between the ocrelizumab and comparator groups. However, insufficient data were available to assess longer-term AEs, e.g., malignancy.

摘要

简介

我们系统地回顾了奥瑞珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的不良事件(AE)。

涵盖领域

我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和毒理学数据网络-TOXLINE(从建库到 2020 年 7 月 8 日)、临床试验注册库和产品说明书,以寻找评估奥瑞珠单抗 AE 的任何临床试验、观察性研究或病例报告。有/无对照药物或安慰剂的研究符合入选标准。

专家意见

纳入了 78 篇记录(4 项随机对照试验(RCT)、4 项开放标签试验、29 项观察性研究和 27 项病例报告)。AE 影响了 4498 名奥瑞珠单抗暴露患者中的 2756 名(61.3%)。最常见的 AE 是感染(n=1342,奥瑞珠单抗暴露患者的 39.2%)和输注相关反应(n=1391,奥瑞珠单抗暴露患者的 26.2%)。与β干扰素相比,奥瑞珠单抗暴露患者发生感染的可能性更高(风险比(RR)=1.10;95%置信区间(CI):1.01-1.19),包括:疱疹相关(RR=1.75;95%CI:1.11-2.76)、呼吸道相关(RR=1.42;95%CI:1.10-1.84 和 RR=1.61;95%CI:1.10-2.35)、鼻咽炎(RR=1.47;95%CI:1.13-1.90)和鼻炎(RR=4.00;95%CI:1.13-14.14)。与奥瑞珠单抗相比,输注相关反应(RR 范围:1.57-4.42)在奥瑞珠单抗与安慰剂或β干扰素之间更为常见。来自汇总分析(3 项 RCT)的数据显示,奥瑞珠单抗与对照组之间“任何”严重 AE 的风险无显著差异。然而,尚无足够的数据评估长期 AE,例如恶性肿瘤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验