• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚医学生对老年人态度的横断面研究证实了澳大利亚老龄化语义差异的四因素结构和心理测量特性。

Cross-sectional study of Australian medical student attitudes towards older people confirms a four-factor structure and psychometric properties of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential.

机构信息

Graduate Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 16;10(8):e036108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036108.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036108
PMID:32801196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430444/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Australian Ageing Semantic Differential (AASD) survey was developed to quantify medical student attitudes towards older people. The purpose of this study is to examine psychometric properties of the survey and confirm its factor structure of four composites.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Three medical schools in three Australian states: Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Third-year or fourth-year medical students (n=188, response rate=79%).

OUTCOME MEASURES

In the previous AASD study, exploratory factor analysis supported a four-factor model consisting of 'Instrumentality' (I), 'Personal Appeal' (PA), 'Experience' (E) and 'Sociability' (S). Congeneric one-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to examine model fit for factors using a new student sample (n=188).Psychometric properties of survey items and factors.Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from this study and earlier AASD study (n=509).

RESULTS

Indices of fit (Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardised root mean square residual (SRMR)) for data to the factor model were: PA adequate fit (CFI=0.94, TLI=0.89, RMSEA=0.11 and SRMR=0.05), I good fit (CFI=0.99, TLI=0.99, RMSEA=0.04 and SRMR=0.03), S good fit (CFI=0.98, TLI=0.95, RMSEA=0.06 and SRMR=0.03) and E excellent fit (CFI=1.0, TLI=1.0, RMSEA=0.00 and SRMR=0.01).The AASD was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha=0.84), without difference in mean student scores by institution. Mean AASD score was positive for medical students outside New South Wales (73.2/114).Mean I score for all Australian students was negative, with female respondents' mean E score significantly higher than their counterparts. A positive correlation between student age and I score was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The AASD is internally consistent and generalisable within Australia, with acceptable structural validity for measuring medical student attitudes towards older people within a four-factor model. Student attitudes were positive globally and within all factors except I. Female students rated older persons E more positively. Older students recorded more positive attitudes towards I of older people.

摘要

目的

澳大利亚老龄化语义差异(AASD)调查旨在量化医学生对老年人的态度。本研究的目的是检验调查的心理测量特性,并确认其四个综合因素的结构。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

澳大利亚三个州的三所医学院:维多利亚州、西澳大利亚州和南澳大利亚州。

参与者

三年级或四年级医学生(n=188,应答率=79%)。

结果测量

在之前的 AASD 研究中,探索性因素分析支持一个由“工具性”(I)、“个人吸引力”(PA)、“经验”(E)和“社交性”(S)组成的四因素模型。使用新的学生样本(n=188)进行的同型单因素验证性因素分析(CFA)用于检验因素的模型拟合情况。调查项目和因素的心理测量特性。对本研究和之前 AASD 研究(n=509)的汇总数据进行事后分析。

结论

数据拟合因子模型的拟合指数(比较拟合指数(CFI)、塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)、均方根误差逼近(RMSEA)、标准化均方根残差(SRMR))为:PA 适度拟合(CFI=0.94,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.11,SRMR=0.05),I 良好拟合(CFI=0.99,TLI=0.99,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.03),S 良好拟合(CFI=0.98,TLI=0.95,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.03)和 E 极好拟合(CFI=1.0,TLI=1.0,RMSEA=0.00,SRMR=0.01)。AASD 具有内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.84),不同机构的学生平均分数没有差异。新南威尔士州以外的医学生 AASD 平均得分为 73.2/114,呈阳性。所有澳大利亚学生的平均 I 分数均为负值,女性受访者的平均 E 分数明显高于男性。学生年龄与 I 分数呈正相关。

结论

AASD 在澳大利亚内部具有一致性和可推广性,在四因素模型中具有可接受的结构有效性,可用于测量医学生对老年人的态度。全球范围内和所有因素(除 I 外)的学生态度均为积极。女性学生对老年人的 E 评价更为积极。年龄较大的学生对老年人的 I 态度更为积极。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c14c/7430444/73725d0da808/bmjopen-2019-036108f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c14c/7430444/73725d0da808/bmjopen-2019-036108f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c14c/7430444/73725d0da808/bmjopen-2019-036108f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional study of Australian medical student attitudes towards older people confirms a four-factor structure and psychometric properties of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential.澳大利亚医学生对老年人态度的横断面研究证实了澳大利亚老龄化语义差异的四因素结构和心理测量特性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 16;10(8):e036108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036108.
2
Development of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential, a new instrument for measuring Australian medical student attitudes towards older people.澳大利亚老龄化语义差异量表的开发,这是一种用于测量澳大利亚医学生对老年人态度的新工具。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38(3):e67-e74. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12627. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版患者安全文化医院调查量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e030972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030972.
4
Examining the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy in clinical teaching scale with undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional study.用本科护生检验临床教学自我效能感量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104093. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104093. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the German Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and its potential for cross-cultural comparisons: a cross-sectional study.评估德国医院患者安全文化调查的心理测量特性及其进行跨文化比较的潜力:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 9;7(11):e018366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018366.
6
Development and validation of the mpox stigma scale (MSS) and mpox knowledge scale (MKS).开发和验证猴痘耻辱量表(MSS)和猴痘知识量表(MKS)。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):2469. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19868-x.
7
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者中文版匹兹堡疲劳量表的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 12;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01815-8.
8
Measuring public attitudes towards people living with chronic diseases in Arabic-speaking populations: adaptation and development of the Social Stigma Scale of Chronic Diseases (SSS-CD).测量阿拉伯语人群中对慢性病患者的公众态度:慢性病社会污名量表(SSS-CD)的适应和发展。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):1375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16315-1.
9
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Does Not Have Adequate Structural Validity for Use With Young, Active Patients With ACL Tears.膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分在用于 ACL 撕裂的年轻、活跃患者时,其结构效度不足。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1342-1350. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002158. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Validation of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) questionnaire in Australian public hospitals.验证患者安全量表(PMOS)问卷在澳大利亚公立医院中的适用性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz097.

引用本文的文献

1
Scales used to assess ageism in the health care sector: a (COSMIN) systematic review of the measurement properties.用于评估医疗保健领域年龄歧视的量表:(COSMIN)测量属性的系统评价
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06338-1.
2
Implementation of a Healthcare of Elderly Course With Multi-Professional Teachers for Undergraduate Medical Students in a Public University in Malaysia-A Quasi-Experimental Pre and Post Study.实施多专业教师老年保健课程,提高马来西亚公立大学医学生的能力:一项准实验性前后研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;9:743804. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.743804. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential, a new instrument for measuring Australian medical student attitudes towards older people.澳大利亚老龄化语义差异量表的开发,这是一种用于测量澳大利亚医学生对老年人态度的新工具。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38(3):e67-e74. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12627. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Australian general practitioner attitudes to residential aged care facility visiting.澳大利亚全科医生对入住养老院探访的态度。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):e497-e504. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12561. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
Medical student attitudes towards older people: a critical review of quantitative measures.
医学生对老年人的态度:对定量测量方法的批判性综述。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jan 24;11(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3186-z.
4
Understanding Australian medical student attitudes towards older people.了解澳大利亚医学生对老年人的态度。
Australas J Ageing. 2018 Jun;37(2):93-98. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12495. Epub 2018 Jan 14.
5
Perceptions of health-care professionals' treatment of older people.医护人员对老年人治疗的看法。
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Jun;36(2):102-106. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12437.
6
Factors related to medical students' and doctors' attitudes towards older patients: a systematic review.与医学生和医生对老年患者态度相关的因素:系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2017 Nov 1;46(6):911-919. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx058.
7
Experiencing aging or demystifying myths? - impact of different "geriatrics and gerontology" teaching strategies in first year medical students.经历衰老还是破除迷思?——不同“老年医学与老年学”教学策略对一年级医学生的影响
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0872-9.
8
When Contact Is Not Enough: Affecting First Year Medical Students' Image towards Older Persons.仅靠接触并不够:影响一年级医学生对老年人的看法
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169977. eCollection 2017.
9
Home visits and nursing home visits by early-career GPs: a cross-sectional study.初出茅庐的全科医生进行家访和疗养院访视:一项横断面研究。
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):77-82. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw099. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.越多就一定越好吗?验证性因素分析中每个因素的指标数量。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1998 Apr 1;33(2):181-220. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1.