Suppr超能文献

[腹会阴直肠切除术后骨盆伤口愈合情况。一项前瞻性随机研究中两种引流方法的比较]

[Wound healing of the pelvis following abdominoperineal rectum extirpation. A comparison of 2 drainage procedures in a prospective randomized study].

作者信息

Wilkening H, Bödeker H, Gebhardt C

机构信息

Zentrum für Chirurgie des Städtischen Klinikums Nürnberg.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1988 Jan;59(1):20-3.

PMID:3280267
Abstract

In a prospectively randomized study we used two different ways of drainage of the sacral space after an abdomino-perineal-resection of the rectum. One group with 25 patients had a drainage anteriorly through the abdominal wall, the other 25 patients got a drainage posteriorly through the buttocks. In each case we used two closed silicone-drainage-systems without active suction. In 60% of the anterior and in 50% of the posterior drained cases we saw an unaffected primary healing of the sacral wound. There was no significant difference. The patients felt the anterior way of drainage to be more convenient. Contamination of the sacral space by disrupture of the rectum during the operation was followed by a sacral abscess in 50%.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,我们在直肠癌腹会阴切除术后采用了两种不同的骶骨间隙引流方式。一组25例患者通过腹壁进行前路引流,另一组25例患者通过臀部进行后路引流。在每种情况下,我们都使用了两个无主动吸引的封闭式硅胶引流系统。在前路引流的病例中,60%以及后路引流的病例中50%可见骶骨伤口一期愈合良好,无显著差异。患者感觉前路引流方式更方便。手术过程中直肠破裂导致骶骨间隙污染,50%的患者随后出现骶骨脓肿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验