Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dutch Social Security Institute: Institute for Employee Benefits Schemes (UWV), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Jun;31(2):293-315. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09918-7.
A shift from providing long-term disability benefits to promoting work reintegration of people with remaining work capacity in many countries requires new instruments for work capacity assessments. Recently, a practice-based instrument addressing biopsychosocial aspects of functioning, the Social Medical Work Capacity instrument (SMWC), was developed. Our aim was to examine the content validity of the SMWC using ICF core sets.
First, we conducted a systematic search to identify relevant ICF core sets for the working age population. Second the content of these core sets were mapped to assess the relevance and comprehensiveness of the SMWC. Next, we compared the content of the SMWC with the ICF-core sets.
Two work-related core sets and 31 disease-specific core sets were identified. The SMWC and the two work-related core sets overlap on 47 categories. Compared to the work-related core sets, the Body Functions and Activities and Participation are well represented in the new instrument, while the component Environmental factors is under-represented. Compared to the disease-specific core sets, items related to the social and domestic environmental factors are under-represented, while the SMWC included work-related factors complementary to the ICF.
The SMWC content seems relevant, but could be more comprehensive for the purpose of individual work capacity assessments. To improve assessing relevant biopsychosocial aspects, it is recommended to extend the instrument by adding personal and environmental (work- and social-related) factors as well as a more tailored use of the SMWC for assessing work capacity of persons with specific diseases or underlying illness.
许多国家从提供长期残疾福利转向促进有剩余工作能力的人重新融入工作,这需要新的工具来评估工作能力。最近,一种基于实践的、针对功能的生物心理社会方面的工具,即社会医学工作能力量表(SMWC),已经开发出来。我们的目的是使用 ICF 核心组来检验 SMWC 的内容效度。
首先,我们进行了系统搜索,以确定与工作年龄人口相关的 ICF 核心组。其次,对这些核心组的内容进行映射,以评估 SMWC 的相关性和全面性。接下来,我们将 SMWC 的内容与 ICF 核心组进行比较。
确定了两个与工作相关的核心组和 31 个疾病特异性核心组。SMWC 与这两个工作相关的核心组在 47 个类别上重叠。与工作相关的核心组相比,新仪器在身体功能和活动以及参与方面得到了很好的体现,而环境因素这一组成部分则没有得到充分体现。与疾病特异性核心组相比,与社会和国内环境因素相关的项目没有得到充分体现,而 SMWC 则包括了与 ICF 互补的与工作相关的因素。
SMWC 的内容似乎是相关的,但为了进行个人工作能力评估,它可能还不够全面。为了更好地评估相关的生物心理社会方面,建议通过增加个人和环境(工作和社会相关)因素来扩展该工具,并更有针对性地使用 SMWC 来评估特定疾病或潜在疾病患者的工作能力。