Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Aug 15;22(10):54. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01177-w.
The topic of sex doll ownership is becoming an increasingly discussed issue from both a social and legal perspective. This review aims to examine the veracity of the existing psychological, sexological, and legal literature in relation to doll ownership.
Strong views exist across the spectrum of potential socio-legal positions on sex doll ownership. However, there is an almost total lack of empirical analyses of the psychological characteristics or behavioral implications of doll ownership. As such, existing arguments appear to represent the philosophical positions of those scholars expressing them, rather than being rooted in any objective evidence base. Despite an absence of empirical data on the characteristics and subsequent effects of doll ownership, discussions about the ethical and legal status of doll ownership continue. This highlights a real and urgent need for a coherent research agenda to be advanced in this area of work.
目的综述:性玩偶的拥有问题正逐渐成为一个从社会和法律角度来看都被广泛讨论的话题。本文旨在从心理学、性科学和法律文献的角度来检验有关玩偶拥有的现有文献的真实性。
最近发现:对于性玩偶的拥有,潜在的社会法律立场之间存在着强烈的观点分歧。然而,几乎完全缺乏对玩偶拥有的心理特征或行为影响的实证分析。因此,现有的论点似乎代表了提出这些论点的学者的哲学立场,而不是基于任何客观的证据基础。尽管缺乏关于玩偶拥有的特征和后续影响的实证数据,但关于玩偶拥有的伦理和法律地位的讨论仍在继续。这突显了在这一工作领域推进一个连贯的研究议程的真正和迫切需要。