Chin Robert, Hayase Justin, Hu Peng, Cao Minsong, Deng Jie, Ajijola Olujimi, Do Duc, Vaseghi Marmar, Buch Eric, Khakpour Houman, Fujimura Osamu, Krokhaleva Yuliya, Macias Carlos, Sorg Julie, Gima Jean, Pavez Geraldine, Boyle Noel G, Steinberg Michael, Shivkumar Kalyanam, Bradfield Jason S
Radiation Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, 100 Medical Plaza, Suite 660, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;61(3):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00849-0. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
Initial studies have reported excellent safety and efficacy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).
This is a single-center retrospective analysis of eight consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for refractory, scar-related VT. The anatomic target for radioablation was defined based on surface 12-lead ECG VT morphology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and electroanatomic mapping data when available. The target volume treated and the prescribed radiation dose (15-25 Gy) was based on the combined clinical assessment of the cardiac electrophysiologist and radiation oncologist. Ventricular arrhythmias, radiation-related outcomes, and adverse events were monitored at follow-up.
Eight patients underwent nine SBRT sessions. All patients were male with an average age of 75 ± 7.3 years and mean ejection fraction of 21 ± 7%. SBRT was performed with delivery of an average of 22.2 ± 3.6 Gy in a single session with a procedure time of 18.2 ± 6.0 min. All but one session was performed on an inpatient basis. No acute complications occurred. During a median follow-up of 7.8 months (IQR 4.8, 9.9), ICD therapies decreased from median 69.5 (43.5, 115.8) pre-SBRT to 13.3 (IQR 7.7, 35.8) post-SBRT (p = 0.036). There were three patient deaths in the follow-up period, unrelated to SBRT. Apparent clinical benefit occurred 33% of the time after SBRT.
The patients experienced overall reduction in VT burden following SBRT, though not with the immediate effect seen in other patient series. Further studies (basic, translational, and clinical) are essential to determine the benefit of SBRT and if so, the optimal protocols and patient selection.
初步研究报告了立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)在难治性室性心动过速(VT)患者中的卓越安全性和疗效。
这是一项对8例因难治性、瘢痕相关性室性心动过速接受SBRT治疗的连续患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。当有可用数据时,基于体表12导联心电图室性心动过速形态、心脏磁共振成像和电解剖标测数据来定义放射消融的解剖靶点。所治疗的靶体积和规定的放射剂量(15 - 25 Gy)基于心脏电生理学家和放射肿瘤学家的综合临床评估。在随访期间监测室性心律失常、放射相关结果和不良事件。
8例患者接受了9次SBRT治疗。所有患者均为男性,平均年龄75 ± 7.3岁,平均射血分数21 ± 7%。SBRT单次治疗平均给予22.2 ± 3.6 Gy,治疗时间为18.2 ± 6.0分钟。除1次治疗外,其余均在住院期间进行。未发生急性并发症。在中位随访7.8个月(四分位间距4.8,9.9)期间,植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗次数从SBRT前的中位69.5次(43.5,115.8)降至SBRT后的13.3次(四分位间距7.7,35.8)(p = 0.036)。随访期间有3例患者死亡,与SBRT无关。SBRT后33%的时间出现明显临床获益。
患者在SBRT后室性心动过速负担总体减轻,尽管不像其他患者系列那样有即刻效果。进一步的研究(基础、转化和临床)对于确定SBRT的益处以及如果有益,确定最佳方案和患者选择至关重要。