• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淡漠评估量表的临床实用性和心理计量学特性。

Clinical utility and psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital.

出版信息

Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Aug;65(3):311-312. doi: 10.1037/rep0000356.

DOI:10.1037/rep0000356
PMID:32804534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8127218/
Abstract

The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) is a tool utilized with individuals with brain injury, neurocognitive disorders, and other mixed populations to quantify and characterize apathy in adults. The scale "treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior." It has three versions: self-rated (AES-S), clinician-rated (AES-C), and informant-rated (AES-I). Using factor analysis, Marin and colleagues identified three factors for the scale, including general apathy, disinterest or amotivation, and lack of concern. The psychometric properties of the AES have been examined in various clinical cohorts, including individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis, severe mental illness, and cognitively healthy middle-aged cohort who are at risk for AD. The AES is a useful, reliable, and valid instrument to quantify and measure severity of apathy symptoms in adults. It is important to note that the AES-C and AES-S were able to discriminate apathy from depression and anxiety better than the AES-I did. It has been translated into Japanese, Portuguese, German, and Turkish. As a neuropsychiatric symptom, apathy should be measured in examining problems of relevance to psychology, psychiatry, and neurology, which may aid in understanding motivation, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

淡漠评估量表(AES)是一种用于脑损伤、神经认知障碍和其他混合人群的工具,用于量化和描述成年人的淡漠。该量表“将淡漠视为一种心理维度,其特征是目标导向行为的明显行为、认知和情感伴随物同时存在缺陷”。它有三个版本:自评版(AES-S)、临床医生评定版(AES-C)和知情人评定版(AES-I)。马林等人通过因素分析,确定了量表的三个因素,包括一般淡漠、不感兴趣或无动机以及缺乏关注。AES 的心理测量特性已在各种临床队列中进行了检查,包括阿尔茨海默病(AD)、创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、获得性脑损伤、多发性硬化症、严重精神疾病以及认知健康的中年 AD 高危人群。AES 是一种有用、可靠和有效的工具,可用于量化和测量成年人淡漠症状的严重程度。需要注意的是,AES-C 和 AES-S 比 AES-I 更能区分淡漠与抑郁和焦虑。它已被翻译成日语、葡萄牙语、德语和土耳其语。作为一种神经精神症状,在检查与心理学、精神病学和神经病学相关的问题时,应该测量淡漠,这可能有助于理解动机、预后和鉴别诊断。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Clinical utility and psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.淡漠评估量表的临床实用性和心理计量学特性。
Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Aug;65(3):311-312. doi: 10.1037/rep0000356.
2
The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-C): Psychometric Properties and Invariance of Italian Version in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.淡漠评估量表(AES-C):在轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的意大利版本的心理测量学特性和不变性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 12;18(18):9597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189597.
3
Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.冷漠评估量表的信度和效度
Psychiatry Res. 1991 Aug;38(2):143-62. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-v.
4
Apathy in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: Psychometric Validation of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.临床前阿尔茨海默病中的淡漠:淡漠评估量表的心理测量学验证。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2019 Feb;34(1):16-22. doi: 10.1177/1533317518794020. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Apathy in multiple sclerosis: a validation study of the apathy evaluation scale.多发性硬化症中的冷漠:冷漠评估量表的验证研究
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Dec 15;347(1-2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
6
Apathy in dementia: an examination of the psychometric properties of the apathy evaluation scale.痴呆中的淡漠:淡漠评估量表心理测量特性的检验
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Winter;19(1):57-64. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2007.19.1.57.
7
[Apathy in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: are there distinct profiles?].[额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病中的冷漠:是否存在不同特征?]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2012 Mar;10(1):107-15. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2012.0315.
8
The Apathy Evaluation Scale: A Comparison of Subject, Informant, and Clinician Report in Cognitively Normal Elderly and Mild Cognitive Impairment.冷漠评估量表:认知正常老年人与轻度认知障碍患者的自评、知情者评和临床医生评比较
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(2):421-32. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150146.
9
Validation of apathy evaluation scale and assessment of severity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease.淡漠评估量表的验证及阿尔茨海默病淡漠严重程度的评估。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Apr;66(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02315.x.
10
Psychometric testing of a Swedish version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.瑞典版淡漠评估量表的心理测量测试。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;71(6):477-484. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1334820. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Apathy in Parkinson's Disease: EEG Microstate Characteristics.帕金森病中的淡漠:脑电图微状态特征
Brain Topogr. 2025 Jun 5;38(4):49. doi: 10.1007/s10548-025-01124-z.
2
Incidence and predictors of neuropsychiatric manifestations following a traumatic brain injury at referral hospitals in Dodoma, Tanzania: A protocol of a prospective longitudinal observational study.坦桑尼亚多多马转诊医院创伤性脑损伤后神经精神表现的发生率和预测因素:一项前瞻性纵向观察研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 28;19(10):e0311091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311091. eCollection 2024.
3
Apathy scores in Parkinson's disease relate to EEG components in an incentivized motor task.帕金森病中的冷漠评分与一项激励性运动任务中的脑电图成分相关。
Brain Commun. 2024 Feb 9;6(1):fcae025. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae025. eCollection 2024.
4
An Update on Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病中淡漠症状的最新进展
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jul 14;8(4):75. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8040075.
5
Association between apathy in patients with maintenance dialysis and hospitalization or mortality: a prospective cohort study.维持性透析患者的淡漠与住院或死亡之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1007977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1007977. eCollection 2023.
6
Reinforcement enhancement by nicotine: A novel abuse-liability assessment of e-cigarettes in young adults.尼古丁增强效应:电子烟对年轻人新的滥用倾向评估
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Dec;30(6):959-972. doi: 10.1037/pha0000496. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Apathy in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: Psychometric Validation of the Apathy Evaluation Scale.临床前阿尔茨海默病中的淡漠:淡漠评估量表的心理测量学验证。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2019 Feb;34(1):16-22. doi: 10.1177/1533317518794020. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
2
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale].《淡漠评估量表日语版的信度与效度》
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2014;51(5):445-52. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.51.445.
3
Apathy in multiple sclerosis: a validation study of the apathy evaluation scale.多发性硬化症中的冷漠:冷漠评估量表的验证研究
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Dec 15;347(1-2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
4
Measuring apathy after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale.创伤性脑损伤后冷漠的测量:冷漠评估量表和额叶系统行为量表的心理测量特性。
Brain Inj. 2009 Dec;23(13-14):999-1007. doi: 10.3109/02699050903379347.
5
Assessing apathy: the use of the Apathy Evaluation Scale in first episode psychosis.评估淡漠:淡漠评定量表在首发精神病中的应用。
Eur Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
6
[Psychometric properties of a German version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale].[德语版冷漠评估量表的心理测量特性]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2006 Dec;74(12):714-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932164.
7
Cognitive correlates of apathy in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤中冷漠的认知关联
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2002 Sep;15(3):184-91.
8
Cutoff score on the apathy evaluation scale in subjects with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者冷漠评估量表的临界分数。
Brain Inj. 2002 Jun;16(6):509-16. doi: 10.1080/02699050110119132.
9
Apathy and depressed mood in acquired brain damage: relationship to lesion localization and psychophysiological reactivity.后天性脑损伤中的冷漠与抑郁情绪:与病变定位及心理生理反应性的关系
Psychol Med. 1999 Mar;29(2):447-56. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798008046.
10
Prevalence of apathy following head injury.头部受伤后冷漠症的患病率。
Brain Inj. 1998 Jan;12(1):87-92. doi: 10.1080/026990598122908.