Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Centre for Science Communication, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237771. eCollection 2020.
It is widely believed that conspiracy theory beliefs are the product of perceived lack of control. However, to date there is mixed evidence, at best, to support this claim. We consider the reasons why conspiracy theory beliefs do not appear to be based in any straightforward way on control beliefs, interrogating existing findings and presenting new data that call the relationship into question. Across six studies conducted online using MTurk samples, we observed no effect of control manipulations on conspiracy theory beliefs, while replicating previously reported correlational evidence of their association. The results suggest that conspiracy beliefs are not suitable for compensating for threats to control. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between experimental and correlational effects and examine the limitations of the studies.
人们普遍认为,阴谋论信仰是感知到缺乏控制的产物。然而,迄今为止,最好的情况也只是有一些混合证据支持这一说法。我们考虑了为什么阴谋论信仰似乎不是基于任何直接的控制信仰的原因,检验了现有发现并提出了新的数据,这些数据对这种关系提出了质疑。在使用 MTurk 样本进行的六项在线研究中,我们没有观察到控制操作对阴谋论信仰的影响,同时复制了先前报告的它们之间关联的相关证据。研究结果表明,阴谋论信仰不适合用来弥补对控制的威胁。我们讨论了实验和相关影响之间差异的可能原因,并检查了研究的局限性。