Ponti Giovanni, Maccaferri Monia, Percesepe Antonio, Tomasi Aldo, Ozben Tomris
Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Dermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Jan;58(1):60-76. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1803789. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Although prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common tumors in European males, the only minimally invasive diagnostic tool in PCa setup is the determination of PSA in serum. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been demonstrated to be helpful for PCa diagnosis but has not yet been integrated into the clinical setting. This review aims to provide a systematic update of cfDNA and its fragmentation patterns in PCa reported in literature published over the last twenty years. Due to the high variability of the scientific methods adopted and a lack of standardized median cfDNA levels, results fluctuate across different studies. These differences may be due to the cfDNA source, the quantification method, or the fragmentation pattern. Blood plasma is the most frequently analyzed biological fluid, but seminal plasma has been reported to contain higher cfDNA concentration due to its vicinity to the tumor origin. CfDNA has been shown to be composed of single-stranded (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), so the total cfDNA concentration should be preferred as it corresponds best to the tumor mass. Fluorometry and capillary electrophoresis (CE) may be quick and cost-effective tools for cfDNA assessment in a clinical setting. The greatest future challenge is the elaboration of common guidelines and standardized procedures for diagnostic laboratories performing cfDNA analysis. A multiparametric approach combining the analysis of total cfDNA (both ssDNA and dsDNA), cfDNA fragment length, and specific genetic mutations (ctDNA assessment) is required for optimal future applications of liquid biopsy.
尽管前列腺癌(PCa)是欧洲男性中最常见的肿瘤之一,但在前列腺癌诊断中唯一的微创诊断工具是血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)的测定。无细胞DNA(cfDNA)已被证明有助于前列腺癌的诊断,但尚未纳入临床应用。本综述旨在系统更新过去二十年文献中报道的cfDNA及其在前列腺癌中的片段化模式。由于所采用科学方法的高度变异性以及缺乏标准化的cfDNA中位水平,不同研究的结果波动较大。这些差异可能归因于cfDNA来源、定量方法或片段化模式。血浆是最常分析的生物体液,但据报道,由于精浆靠近肿瘤起源,其cfDNA浓度更高。cfDNA已被证明由单链DNA(ssDNA)和双链DNA(dsDNA)组成,因此总cfDNA浓度更可取,因为它与肿瘤大小最相符。荧光测定法和毛细管电泳(CE)可能是临床环境中评估cfDNA的快速且经济高效的工具。未来最大的挑战是为进行cfDNA分析的诊断实验室制定通用指南和标准化程序。液体活检的最佳未来应用需要一种多参数方法,将总cfDNA(ssDNA和dsDNA)分析、cfDNA片段长度分析和特定基因突变(循环肿瘤DNA评估)相结合。