Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental School/Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.
J Dent. 2020 Nov;102:103452. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103452. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
Detailed information on potential conflict of interest (COI) and sponsorship is pivotal for the adequate understanding and appropriate interpretation of the reported study results. The reporting of COI and sponsorship and any potential associations with study characteristics in publications of all dental journals with impact factor was examined.
The Web of Science database was searched, in March 2019, for articles published from February 28, 2018 to March 1, 2019. A random a sample of 1000 articles in English was selected. Two independent authors extracted the following article characteristics: type of article, dental field, number of authors, country/continent affiliation of the first author, dental journal, journal impact factor, number of citations, Altmetric score, type of COI and sponsorship. Disagreements during data extraction were resolved by discussion and consensus. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the selected variables and multinomial logistic regression was implemented to assess the association between COI, sponsorship, and the other variables.
3% of dental publications declared a COI, whereas in 32.5% of publications the presence of COI was unclear. The most prevalent type of COI was financial (n = 26). Non-profit organizations funded 37.2% of the articles, while the sponsorship for 40.4% articles was unclear. Regression analysis showed that publications reporting COI had greater odds of receiving sponsorship from for-profit sources.
Sponsorship and COI information seem to be underreported in dental journals. Efforts should be made by authors, journals, and publishers to provide more comprehensive information to allow the reader to understand the potential impact of sponsorship and COI on study results.
The underreporting of COI and sponsorship in dental articles hinders the interpretation of findings by readers. The results of the present study bring attention to this important topic as well as guide further improvements on the reporting of COI and sponsorship in dental articles.
详细的利益冲突(COI)和赞助信息对于充分理解和适当解释报告的研究结果至关重要。本研究检查了所有具有影响因子的牙科期刊出版物中 COI 和赞助的报告情况,以及任何与研究特征的潜在关联。
2019 年 3 月,通过 Web of Science 数据库检索了 2018 年 2 月 28 日至 2019 年 3 月 1 日期间发表的文章。随机选择了 1000 篇英文文章。两位独立的作者提取了以下文章特征:文章类型、牙科领域、作者人数、第一作者的国家/大陆归属、牙科期刊、期刊影响因子、引用次数、Altmetric 评分、COI 和赞助类型。在数据提取过程中出现的分歧通过讨论和协商解决。对选定变量进行描述性统计,并实施多项逻辑回归来评估 COI、赞助与其他变量之间的关联。
3%的牙科出版物申报了 COI,而 32.5%的出版物中 COI 的存在情况不明确。最常见的 COI 类型是财务(n=26)。非盈利组织资助了 37.2%的文章,而 40.4%的文章的赞助情况不明确。回归分析表明,报告 COI 的出版物更有可能获得营利性来源的赞助。
牙科期刊中似乎对赞助和 COI 信息的报告不足。作者、期刊和出版商应努力提供更全面的信息,使读者能够了解赞助和 COI 对研究结果的潜在影响。
牙科文章中 COI 和赞助信息的漏报阻碍了读者对研究结果的解读。本研究结果引起了对这一重要问题的关注,并为牙科文章中 COI 和赞助的报告提供了进一步的改进方向。