• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用滚动时域优化框架的集中式救护车分流政策,以尽量减少患者延迟。

Centralized Ambulance Diversion Policy Using Rolling-Horizon Optimization Framework to Minimize Patient Tardiness.

作者信息

Baek Sohye, Lee Young Hoon, Park Seong Hyeon

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, 50, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;8(3):266. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030266.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8030266
PMID:32806633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551726/
Abstract

Ambulance diversion (AD) is a common method for reducing crowdedness of emergency departments by diverting ambulance-transported patients to a neighboring hospital. In a multi-hospital system, the AD of one hospital increases the neighboring hospital's congestion. This should be carefully considered for minimizing patients' tardiness in the entire multi-hospital system. Therefore, this paper proposes a centralized AD policy based on a rolling-horizon optimization framework. It is an iterative methodology for coping with uncertainty, which first solves the centralized optimization model formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming model at each discretized time, and then moves forward for the time interval reflecting the realized uncertainty. Furthermore, the decentralized optimization, decentralized priority, and No-AD models are presented for practical application, which can also show the impact of using the following three factors: centralization, mathematical model, and AD strategy. The numerical experiments conducted based on the historical data of Seoul, South Korea, for 2017, show that the centralized AD policy outperforms the other three policies by 30%, 37%, and 44%, respectively, and that all three factors contribute to reducing patients' tardiness. The proposed policy yields an efficient centralized AD management strategy, which can improve the local healthcare system with active coordination between hospitals.

摘要

救护车分流(AD)是一种通过将救护车运送的患者分流到附近医院来减少急诊科拥挤程度的常用方法。在多医院系统中,一家医院的救护车分流会增加附近医院的拥堵情况。为了尽量减少整个多医院系统中患者的延误,这一点应予以仔细考虑。因此,本文提出了一种基于滚动时域优化框架的集中式救护车分流政策。它是一种应对不确定性的迭代方法,首先在每个离散时间求解作为混合整数线性规划模型制定的集中式优化模型,然后针对反映已实现不确定性的时间间隔向前推进。此外,还提出了用于实际应用的分散式优化、分散式优先级和无救护车分流模型,这些模型还可以展示使用以下三个因素的影响:集中化、数学模型和救护车分流策略。基于韩国首尔2017年的历史数据进行的数值实验表明,集中式救护车分流政策分别比其他三种政策的表现高出30%、37%和44%,并且这三个因素都有助于减少患者的延误。所提出的政策产生了一种高效的集中式救护车分流管理策略,该策略可以通过医院之间的积极协调来改善当地医疗系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/e9b5f0edd5f6/healthcare-08-00266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/ffde4ebc3147/healthcare-08-00266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/d1939006b4e6/healthcare-08-00266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/c35b67d19a32/healthcare-08-00266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/371729d29fbb/healthcare-08-00266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/e9b5f0edd5f6/healthcare-08-00266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/ffde4ebc3147/healthcare-08-00266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/d1939006b4e6/healthcare-08-00266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/c35b67d19a32/healthcare-08-00266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/371729d29fbb/healthcare-08-00266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc37/7551726/e9b5f0edd5f6/healthcare-08-00266-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Centralized Ambulance Diversion Policy Using Rolling-Horizon Optimization Framework to Minimize Patient Tardiness.采用滚动时域优化框架的集中式救护车分流政策,以尽量减少患者延迟。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;8(3):266. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030266.
2
The Impact of Ambulance and Patient Diversion on Crowdedness of Multiple Emergency Departments in a Region.救护车和患者分流对某地区多个急诊科拥挤程度的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144227. eCollection 2015.
3
Managing emergency department overcrowding via ambulance diversion: a discrete event simulation model.通过救护车分流管理急诊科拥挤问题:一种离散事件模拟模型。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;114(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Centralized Ambulance Destination Determination: A Retrospective Data Analysis to Determine Impact on EMS System Distribution, Surge Events, and Diversion Status.集中救护车目的地决策:一项回顾性数据分析,旨在确定其对 EMS 系统分布、高峰事件和转院状态的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 26;22(6):1311-1316. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53198.
5
A sustainable supply chain network considering lot sizing with quantity discounts under disruption risks: centralized and decentralized models.考虑中断风险下带有数量折扣的批量规模的可持续供应链网络:集中式和分散式模型
J Comb Optim. 2022;44(3):1387-1432. doi: 10.1007/s10878-022-00891-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Ambulance diversions following public hospital emergency department closures.公立医院急诊科关闭后救护车的分流情况。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):870-879. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13147. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Ambulance Diversion: Ethical Dilema and Necessary Evil.救护车分流:伦理困境与必要之恶
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):820-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues.救护车分流与医院收入损失。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
9
Closing the loop of a global supply chain through a robust optimal decentralized decision support system.通过稳健的最优分散式决策支持系统闭环全球供应链。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(39):89975-90005. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23176-5. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
10
Closure simulation for reduction of emergency patient diversion: a discrete agent-based simulation approach to minimizing ambulance diversion.紧急患者分流减少的闭合模拟:最小化救护车分流的离散代理基模拟方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Jun 8;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0330-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance diversion and its use as an ED overcrowding mitigation strategy: Does it work? A scoping review.救护车分流及其作为缓解急诊科拥挤的策略:它有效吗?一项范围综述。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 8;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00933-0.
2
Effect of Designating Emergency Medical Centers for Critical Care on Emergency Medical Service Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Observational Study.指定重症监护急救医疗中心对新冠疫情期间急救医疗服务系统的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 9;11(4):906. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040906.

本文引用的文献

1
Examination of EMS Decision Making in Determining Suitability of Patient Diversion to Urgent Care Centers.急诊医疗服务(EMS)在确定患者分流至紧急护理中心的适宜性方面的决策审查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Feb 2;7(1):24. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010024.
2
A review on ambulance offload delay literature.救护车下客延误文献综述。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):658-675. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9450-x. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
3
Closure simulation for reduction of emergency patient diversion: a discrete agent-based simulation approach to minimizing ambulance diversion.
紧急患者分流减少的闭合模拟:最小化救护车分流的离散代理基模拟方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Jun 8;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0330-0.
4
Ambulance traffic accidents in Taiwan.台湾救护车交通事故。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Apr;117(4):283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
The Impact of Ambulance and Patient Diversion on Crowdedness of Multiple Emergency Departments in a Region.救护车和患者分流对某地区多个急诊科拥挤程度的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144227. eCollection 2015.
6
Editorial: Ambulance Diversion: the Con Perspective.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):818-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
Managing emergency department overcrowding via ambulance diversion: a discrete event simulation model.通过救护车分流管理急诊科拥挤问题:一种离散事件模拟模型。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;114(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
Ambulance diversion by cooperation: a positive experience with a physician-directed ambulance diversion policy in Charleston County, South Carolina.通过合作进行救护车分流:南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿县一项由医生主导的救护车分流政策的积极经验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;64(1):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.021.
9
Reducing ambulance diversion at hospital and regional levels: systemic review of insights from simulation models.减少医院和地区层面的救护车分流:对模拟模型见解的系统评价
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;14(5):489-98. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.3.12788.
10
Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients.急诊拥挤对住院患者结局的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):605-611.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Dec 6.