• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利的假新闻与新冠疫情:一项定量观察性研究的结果。

Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Science, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165850.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165850
PMID:32806772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7459609/
Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, risk communication has often been ineffective, and from this perspective "fake news" has found fertile ground, both as a cause and a consequence of it. The aim of this study is to measure how much "fake news" and corresponding verified news have circulated in Italy in the period between 31 December 2019 and 30 April 2020, and to estimate the quality of informal and formal communication. We used the BuzzSumo application to gather the most shared links on the Internet related to the pandemic in Italy, using keywords chosen according to the most frequent "fake news" during that period. For each research we noted the numbers of "fake news" articles and science-based news articles, as well as the number of engagements. We reviewed 2102 articles. Links that contained fake news were shared 2,352,585 times, accounting for 23.1% of the total shares of all the articles reviewed. Our study throws light on the "fake news" phenomenon in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A quantitative assessment is fundamental in order to understand the impact of false information and to define political and technical interventions in health communication. Starting from this evaluation, health literacy should be improved by means of specific interventions in order to improve informal and formal communication.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,风险沟通往往效果不佳,从这个角度来看,“假新闻”找到了肥沃的土壤,既是其原因也是其结果。本研究旨在衡量在 2019 年 12 月 31 日至 2020 年 4 月 30 日期间,意大利有多少“假新闻”和相应的核实新闻传播,并评估非正式和正式沟通的质量。我们使用 BuzzSumo 应用程序收集了与意大利大流行相关的互联网上最常分享的链接,使用的关键词是根据那段时间最常见的“假新闻”选择的。对于每一项研究,我们记录了“假新闻”文章和基于科学的新闻文章的数量,以及参与度。我们共审查了 2102 篇文章。含有假新闻的链接被分享了 2352585 次,占所有被审查文章总分享量的 23.1%。我们的研究揭示了 SARS-CoV-2 大流行中的“假新闻”现象。为了了解虚假信息的影响并确定卫生沟通方面的政治和技术干预措施,进行定量评估至关重要。在此评估的基础上,应通过特定干预措施提高健康素养,以改善非正式和正式沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/7459609/090dd294eabb/ijerph-17-05850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/7459609/090dd294eabb/ijerph-17-05850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/7459609/090dd294eabb/ijerph-17-05850-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study.意大利的假新闻与新冠疫情:一项定量观察性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165850.
2
The Peru Approach against the COVID-19 Infodemic: Insights and Strategies.秘鲁应对新冠疫情信息疫情的方法:见解与策略。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):583-586. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0536. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
COVID-19-Related Web Search Behaviors and Infodemic Attitudes in Italy: Infodemiological Study.意大利与 COVID-19 相关的网络搜索行为和信息疫情态度:信息疫情研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 5;6(2):e19374. doi: 10.2196/19374.
4
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
5
Big Data Analysis of Media Reports Related to COVID-19.COVID-19 相关媒体报道的大数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165688.
6
Health Communication Through News Media During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Digital Topic Modeling Approach.中国新冠疫情初期通过新闻媒体进行的健康传播:数字主题建模方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 28;22(4):e19118. doi: 10.2196/19118.
7
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
8
Fact or Fake? An analysis of disinformation regarding the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil.事实还是谣言?巴西关于新冠疫情虚假信息的分析
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Oct;25(suppl 2):4201-4210. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.28922020. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Investigating the Prevalence of Reactive Online Searching in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.调查COVID-19大流行期间反应性在线搜索的流行情况:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 27;22(10):e19791. doi: 10.2196/19791.
10
Modelling the antecedent factors that affect online fake news sharing on COVID-19: the moderating role of fake news knowledge.建模影响 COVID-19 期间线上假新闻分享的前置因素:假新闻知识的调节作用。
Health Educ Res. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):490-503. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaa030.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
2
Allostatic load and physiological responses to work stress: an integrative review.应激负荷与工作压力的生理反应:一项综合综述。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Feb 16;21(4):e2023945. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-945. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3
HPV vaccine-related articles shared on Facebook from 2019 to 2021: Did COVID make a difference?

本文引用的文献

1
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息:可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Fear of COVID-19 Scale-Associations of Its Scores with Health Literacy and Health-Related Behaviors among Medical Students.COVID-19 恐惧量表-医学生的得分与健康素养和健康相关行为的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;17(11):4164. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114164.
3
Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study.
2019年至2021年在脸书上分享的与人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗相关的文章:新冠疫情有影响吗?
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 4;4:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100301. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Exploring COVID-19 Phobia among International Chinese College Students in South Korea Before Ending COVID-19 Restrictions.在解除新冠疫情限制措施之前,对韩国的国际中国留学生中的新冠恐惧症进行调查。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 23;12(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01718-5.
5
Limits of functional illiteracy in explaining human misinformation: the knowledge illusion, values, and the dual process theory of thought.功能性文盲在解释人类错误信息方面的局限性:知识错觉、价值观与思维的双过程理论
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1381865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1381865. eCollection 2024.
6
Qualitative perspectives of isolation experiences due to COVID-19 from a group of bioethicists in training performing interdisciplinary healthcare activities. Medellin, Colombia. September 2020.一群正在接受培训、从事跨学科医疗活动的生物伦理学家对因新冠疫情而产生的隔离经历的定性观点。哥伦比亚麦德林。2020年9月。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023 Aug 8;21(2):e2022874. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-874. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
7
COVID-19 emergency: the influence of implicit attitudes, information sources, and individual characteristics on psychological distress, intentions to get vaccinated, and compliance with restrictive rules.新冠疫情紧急情况:内隐态度、信息来源和个体特征对心理困扰、接种疫苗意愿及遵守限制规定的影响
Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Dec 6;10(1):1-12. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2021.111292. eCollection 2022.
8
The Correlation Among COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, the Ability to Detect Fake News, and e-Health Literacy.新冠疫苗接种接受度、识别假新闻能力与电子健康素养的相关性。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jul;7(3):e130-e138. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230621-01. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
Learning about informal fallacies and the detection of fake news: An experimental intervention.了解非形式谬误和虚假新闻的检测:一项实验干预。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 29;18(3):e0283238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283238. eCollection 2023.
10
A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19.一个警示故事:新冠疫情期间的个体决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054597.
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在线患者教育材料的易读性:一项横断面健康素养研究。
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Assessment of COVID-19 Knowledge Among University Students: Implications for Future Risk Communication Strategies.评估大学生对 COVID-19 的认知:对未来风险沟通策略的启示。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):540-543. doi: 10.1177/1090198120931420. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Social Media Sensationalism in the Male Infertility Space: A Mixed Methodology Analysis.男性不育领域的社交媒体轰动效应:一项混合方法分析。
World J Mens Health. 2020 Oct;38(4):591-598. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200009. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
6
A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors.一项针对意大利民众在 COVID-19 大流行期间心理困扰的全国性调查:即时心理反应及相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 2;17(9):3165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093165.
7
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Literacy Research Around the World: More Important Than Ever in a Time of COVID-19.《全球健康素养研究的跨学科视角:在 COVID-19 时代比以往任何时候都更加重要》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):3010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093010.
8
COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem.新冠疫情:健康素养是一个被低估的问题。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e249-e250. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30086-4. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
9
People with Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Were More Likely Depressed and Had Lower Health-Related Quality of Life: The Potential Benefit of Health Literacy.有疑似新冠病毒症状的人更易抑郁且健康相关生活质量较低:健康素养的潜在益处。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 31;9(4):965. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040965.
10
Critical health literacy and the COVID-19 crisis.关键健康素养与新冠疫情危机
Health Promot Int. 2020 Dec 1;35(6):1612-1613. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa040.