• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个警示故事:新冠疫情期间的个体决策。

A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054597.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054597
PMID:36901607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001963/
Abstract

Precaution taking is an important part of managing COVID-19 and has been since the start of the pandemic. Guided by the Health Belief Model, two studies conducted during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic aimed to identify possible individual difference predictors of precautionary actions. Study 1 was an online, cross-sectional study using 763 adults aged 20-79 years old. Study 2, a 30-day daily diary study, examined daily precautions in 261 persons over the age of 55 years old. Study 1 and Study 2 indicated that COVID-19 knowledge predicted precautionary behaviors. Multilevel models from Study 2 indicated that daily increases in in-person interactions and leaving home were associated with decreases in precautions, but increases in disruption to routine were associated with increases in precautions. In both studies, including concurrent and lagged models in Study 2, significant interactions between information seeking and perceived risk suggested higher information seeking was related to higher precautions for those who consider themselves low risk. Findings highlight the burden of daily precautions and potentially modifiable factors of engagement in precautions.

摘要

预防措施是管理 COVID-19 的重要组成部分,从疫情开始就一直如此。受健康信念模型的指导,在 COVID-19 大流行初期进行的两项研究旨在确定预防措施的可能个体差异预测因素。研究 1 是一项在线的横断面研究,涉及 763 名 20-79 岁的成年人。研究 2 是一项为期 30 天的日常日记研究,调查了 261 名 55 岁以上人群的日常预防措施。研究 1 和研究 2 表明,COVID-19 知识预测了预防行为。研究 2 的多层次模型表明,面对面互动和离家外出的日常增加与预防措施的减少有关,但日常生活的中断增加与预防措施的增加有关。在这两项研究中,包括研究 2 中的同期和滞后模型,信息寻求和感知风险之间的显著交互表明,对于那些认为自己风险较低的人来说,较高的信息寻求与较高的预防措施有关。研究结果强调了日常预防措施的负担和预防措施参与的潜在可改变因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c392/10001963/d1378d0ff539/ijerph-20-04597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c392/10001963/c6ed3a3a4ab4/ijerph-20-04597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c392/10001963/d1378d0ff539/ijerph-20-04597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c392/10001963/c6ed3a3a4ab4/ijerph-20-04597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c392/10001963/d1378d0ff539/ijerph-20-04597-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Precautionary Tale: Individual Decision Making in the Time of COVID-19.一个警示故事:新冠疫情期间的个体决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054597.
2
Predictors of poor precautionary practices towards COVID-19 among cancer patients.癌症患者预防 COVID-19 不良措施的预测因素。
Future Oncol. 2021 Dec;17(35):4871-4882. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0193. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
COVID-19 precautionary behavior among Israeli breast cancer patients.以色列乳腺癌患者的 COVID-19 预防行为。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):4075-4080. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05948-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Effects of Age, Gender, Health Status, and Political Party on COVID-19-Related Concerns and Prevention Behaviors: Results of a Large, Longitudinal Cross-sectional Survey.年龄、性别、健康状况和政党对 COVID-19 相关问题和预防行为的影响:一项大型、纵向横断面调查的结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):e24277. doi: 10.2196/24277.
5
Protective motivators and precautionary behaviors against COVID-19 in Turkey.土耳其人预防 COVID-19 的保护动机和预防行为。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac037.
6
Chinese Residents' Perceptions of COVID-19 During the Pandemic: Online Cross-sectional Survey Study.疫情期间中国居民对新冠疫情的认知:在线横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e21672. doi: 10.2196/21672.
7
COVID-19 precautionary behavior: the Israeli case in the initial stage of the outbreak.COVID-19 预防行为:疫情爆发初期的以色列案例。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1718. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09818-8.
8
The North American Layman's Understanding of COVID-19: Are We Doing Enough?北美民众对 COVID-19 的理解:我们做得够吗?
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 3;8:358. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00358. eCollection 2020.
9
Trends and Predictors of COVID-19 Information Sources and Their Relationship With Knowledge and Beliefs Related to the Pandemic: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19 信息来源的趋势和预测因素及其与大流行相关知识和信念的关系:全国性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 8;6(4):e21071. doi: 10.2196/21071.
10
The interplay between cognitive and affective risks in predicting COVID-19 precautions: a longitudinal representative study of Americans.预测新冠疫情预防措施中认知风险与情感风险的相互作用:一项针对美国人的纵向代表性研究
Psychol Health. 2022 Dec;37(12):1565-1583. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2060979. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Sex on COVID-19 Media Exposure, Anxiety, Perceived Risk, and Severity in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.性别对中老年人群体 COVID-19 媒体接触、焦虑、感知风险和严重程度的影响。
J Aging Health. 2022 Jan;34(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/08982643211025383. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Coping with coronavirus disease 2019: Relationships between coping strategies, benefit finding and well-being.应对 2019 年冠状病毒病:应对策略、获益发现与幸福感之间的关系。
Stress Health. 2022 Feb;38(1):47-56. doi: 10.1002/smi.3072. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
3
Public perception and preparedness for the pandemic COVID 19: A Health Belief Model approach.
公众对新冠疫情的认知与防范:基于健康信念模型的方法
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Jan-Mar;9:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Predictors of adherence with home quarantine during COVID-19 crisis: the case of health belief model.新冠疫情危机期间居家隔离依从性的预测因素:以健康信念模型为例
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jan;27(1):215-227. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1871770. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
The vital role of health psychology in the response to COVID-19.健康心理学在应对新冠疫情中的重要作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):831-838. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12484.
6
Mental Health Challenges of United States Healthcare Professionals During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间美国医疗保健专业人员面临的心理健康挑战
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 13;11:2065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02065. eCollection 2020.
7
Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study.意大利的假新闻与新冠疫情:一项定量观察性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165850.
8
Age Differences in Risk and Resilience Factors in COVID-19-Related Stress.年龄对新冠相关压力的风险和应对因素的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e38-e44. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa120.
9
Managing stress during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond: Reappraisal and mindset approaches.在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后应对压力:重新评估和思维方式方法。
Stress Health. 2020 Aug;36(3):396-401. doi: 10.1002/smi.2969. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Relationships Between Initial COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Protective Health Behaviors: A National Survey.新冠病毒初期风险感知与防护健康行为的关系:一项全国性调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 22.