National Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Aug 18;29:e161. doi: 10.1017/S204579602000075X.
To identify and synthesise the literature on the cost of mental disorders.
Systematic literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, EconLit, NHS York Database and PsychInfo using key terms for cost and mental disorders. Searches were restricted to January 1980-May 2019. The inclusion criteria were: (1) cost-of-illness studies or cost-analyses; (2) diagnosis of at least one mental disorder; (3) study population based on the general population; (4) outcome in monetary units. The systematic review was preregistered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019127783).
In total, 13 579 potential titles and abstracts were screened and 439 full-text articles were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Of these, 112 articles were included from the systematic searches and 31 additional articles from snowball searching, resulting in 143 included articles. Data were available from 48 countries and categorised according to nine mental disorder groups. The quality of the studies varied widely and there was a lack of studies from low- and middle-income countries and for certain types of mental disorders (e.g. intellectual disabilities and eating disorders). Our study showed that certain groups of mental disorders are more costly than others and that these rankings are relatively stable between countries. An interactive data visualisation site can be found here: https://nbepi.com/econ.
This is the first study to provide a comprehensive overview of the cost of mental disorders worldwide.
识别和综合精神障碍相关成本的文献。
在 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、EconLit、NHS York 数据库和 PsychInfo 数据库中使用成本和精神障碍的关键词进行系统文献检索。检索时间限定为 1980 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月。纳入标准为:(1)疾病成本研究或成本分析;(2)至少诊断有一种精神障碍;(3)研究人群基于普通人群;(4)结果以货币单位表示。系统评价在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42019127783)上预先注册。
共筛选出 13579 个潜在的标题和摘要,并由两名独立的评审员评估了 439 篇全文文章。其中,从系统检索中纳入了 112 篇文章,从滚雪球检索中纳入了 31 篇文章,共纳入 143 篇文章。数据来自 48 个国家,按 9 种精神障碍类型进行分类。研究的质量差异很大,缺乏来自中低收入国家和某些类型的精神障碍(如智力残疾和饮食障碍)的研究。我们的研究表明,某些精神障碍群体的成本高于其他群体,而且这些排名在国家之间相对稳定。交互式数据可视化网站可在此处找到:https://nbepi.com/econ。
这是第一项提供全球精神障碍成本综合概述的研究。