Suppr超能文献

经颅交流电刺激(tACS)作为一种有前途的治疗选择,可改善轻度认知障碍患者的认知功能:tACS 与 tDCS 的直接比较。

tACS as a promising therapeutic option for improving cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: A direct comparison between tACS and tDCS.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;141:248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

Abstract

Neuromodulation has gained attention as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, no studies have directly compared the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on MCI patients. We aimed to identify the more promising and efficient therapeutic option between tACS and tDCS for cognitive enhancement in MCI patients. We compared the effects of gamma-tACS with tDCS on cognitive function and electroencephalography (EEG) in MCI patients. In this sham-controlled, double-blinded, repeated-measures study with the order of the stimulation counterbalanced across patients (n = 20), both gamma-tACS (40 H z) and tDCS were administered at the same intensity (2 mA) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 30 min. Cognitive tests (Stroop and Trail-Making-Test [TMT]) and EEG were performed before and after single-session stimulation. Gamma-tACS improved the Stroop-color in comparison with tDCS (p = .044) and sham (p = .010) and enhanced the TMT-B in comparison with sham (p = .021). However, tDCS was not significantly different from sham in changes of any cognitive test scores. In EEG analysis, gamma-tACS increased beta activity in comparison with sham and tDCS, whereas tDCS decreased delta and theta activity in comparison with sham. Gamma-tACS also increased beta 2 source activity in the anterior cingulate, compared to sham. The cognitive benefits of tACS in MCI patients appeared superior to those of tDCS. tACS facilitated cognitive function by increasing beta activity, while tDCS delayed the progression of MCI symptoms by decreasing slow-frequency activity. Thus, tACS could be used as a new therapeutic option for MCI.

摘要

神经调节作为一种潜在的非药物干预手段,已引起了对轻度认知障碍(MCI)的关注。然而,目前还没有研究直接比较经颅交流电刺激(tACS)与经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对 MCI 患者的影响。我们旨在确定 tACS 和 tDCS 中哪一种治疗选择更有前途和更有效,以增强 MCI 患者的认知能力。我们比较了γ-tACS 与 tDCS 对 MCI 患者认知功能和脑电图(EEG)的影响。在这项假刺激对照、双盲、重复测量研究中,患者之间的刺激顺序是平衡的(n=20),γ-tACS(40 Hz)和 tDCS 以相同的强度(2 mA)在背外侧前额叶皮层中进行 30 分钟。在单次刺激前后进行认知测试(Stroop 和 Trail-Making-Test [TMT])和 EEG 测试。与 tDCS(p=0.044)和假刺激(p=0.010)相比,γ-tACS 改善了 Stroop 颜色,与假刺激(p=0.021)相比,TMT-B 也得到了增强。然而,tDCS 与 sham 相比,任何认知测试分数的变化都没有显著差异。在 EEG 分析中,与 sham 和 tDCS 相比,γ-tACS 增加了β活动,而 tDCS 则降低了 sham 的δ和θ活动。与 sham 相比,γ-tACS 还增加了前扣带回的β2 源活动。tACS 在 MCI 患者中的认知益处似乎优于 tDCS。tACS 通过增加β活动促进认知功能,而 tDCS 通过降低慢波活动来延缓 MCI 症状的进展。因此,tACS 可以作为 MCI 的一种新的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验