Suppr超能文献

医生对评估老年驾驶员驾驶能力的实用工具的有用性的看法:一项横断面研究。

Physicians' views on the usefulness of practical tools for assessing the driving ability of older drivers: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Primary Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

出版信息

Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Aug;8(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000332.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore Swiss physicians' views on the usefulness of a self-administered questionnaire completed by older drivers before the consultation and a reference guide summarising current Swiss guidelines on the fitness-to-drive assessment of older drivers. We also aimed to assess the frequency with which physicians used the information sources provided by the Swiss traffic medicine website.

DESIGN

Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in four cantons of Western Switzerland (Geneva, Vaud, Neuchâtel and Jura).

PARTICIPANTS

All physicians certified to carry out fitness-to-drive assessments in the canton of Geneva (medical assessors; n=69) and a random sample of 500 general practitioners practising in the cantons of Vaud, Neuchâtel and Jura were invited to participate. They were asked to report their estimated average number of fitness-to-drive assessments per week and to rate on a 5-point Likert scale the perceived usefulness of the preconsultation patient questionnaire and reference guide, and the frequency of use of the information sources provided by the traffic medicine website. We computed the proportion of physicians who found the assessment tools very/somewhat useful and the proportion of physicians who always/often used the traffic medicine website. We compared the responses according to medical specialty (medical assessors vs general practitioners) using design-based tests and weighted logistic regressions.

RESULTS

268 physicians (47%) agreed to participate in the study. Their median number of assessments was 2 per week (IQR 2). Overall, the majority of physicians found the questionnaire (75%) and reference guide (89%) very/somewhat useful. Only 17% of the sample always/often used the traffic medicine website. There were no statistically significant associations in multivariable analysis between the medical specialty and the perceived usefulness of the questionnaire and reference guide and the frequency of use of the traffic medicine website.

CONCLUSION

Many physicians find the preconsultation patient questionnaire and reference guide useful to guide them for assessing the driving ability of older drivers, but only a minority regularly use the information sources provided by the traffic medicine website. Future studies should explore the reasons why many physicians do not use these available sources of information.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨瑞士医师对老年驾驶员在就诊前自行填写问卷和参考指南的有用性的看法,该指南总结了瑞士当前关于老年驾驶员驾驶能力评估的准则。我们还评估了医师使用瑞士交通医学网站提供的信息源的频率。

设计

基于问卷调查的横断面研究。

地点

该研究在瑞士西部的四个州(日内瓦、沃州、纳沙泰尔和汝拉)进行。

参与者

所有在日内瓦州获得驾驶能力评估认证的医师(医学评估师;n=69)和在沃州、纳沙泰尔和汝拉州随机抽取的 500 名普通执业医师受邀参加。他们被要求报告他们每周进行的驾驶能力评估的平均估计数量,并对就诊前患者问卷和参考指南的有用性进行 5 级李克特量表评分,以及对交通医学网站提供的信息源的使用频率进行评分。我们计算了认为评估工具非常/有些有用的医师比例和始终/经常使用交通医学网站的医师比例。我们使用基于设计的检验和加权逻辑回归比较了不同医疗专业(医学评估师与普通执业医师)的医师的回答。

结果

268 名医师(47%)同意参加研究。他们每周评估的中位数为 2 次(IQR 2)。总体而言,大多数医师认为问卷(75%)和参考指南(89%)非常/有些有用。只有 17%的样本始终/经常使用交通医学网站。多变量分析显示,医学专业与问卷和参考指南的有用性感知以及交通医学网站的使用频率之间没有统计学显著关联。

结论

许多医师认为就诊前患者问卷和参考指南有助于指导他们评估老年驾驶员的驾驶能力,但只有少数医师定期使用交通医学网站提供的信息源。未来的研究应探讨为什么许多医师不使用这些可用的信息来源。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验