• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于二氧化碳去除的森林政策与管理方法。

Forest policy and management approaches for carbon dioxide removal.

作者信息

vonHedemann Nicolena, Wurtzebach Zachary, Timberlake Thomas J, Sinkular Emily, Schultz Courtney A

机构信息

Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 1401 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Center for Large Landscape Conservation, Bozeman, MT, USA.

出版信息

Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20200001. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0001. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2020.0001
PMID:32832067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7435043/
Abstract

Forests increasingly will be used for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) as a natural climate solution, and the implementation of forest-based CDR presents a complex public policy challenge. In this paper, our goal is to review a range of policy tools in place to support use of forests for CDR and demonstrate how concepts from the policy design literature can inform our understanding of this domain. We explore how the utilization of different policy tools shapes our ability to use forests to mitigate and adapt to climate change and consider the challenges of policy mixes and integration, taking a close look at three areas of international forest policy, including the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) and voluntary carbon offset markets. As it is our expertise, we then examine in detail the case of the USA as a country that lacks aggressive implementation of national climate policies but has potential to increase CDR through reforestation and existing forest management on both public and private land. For forest-based CDR to succeed, a wide array of policy tools will have to be implemented in a variety of contexts with an eye towards overcoming the challenges of policy design with regard to uncertainty in policy outcomes, policy coherence around managing forests for carbon simultaneously with other goals and integration across governance contexts and levels.

摘要

森林将越来越多地被用作一种自然气候解决方案来去除二氧化碳(CDR),而基于森林的CDR实施带来了复杂的公共政策挑战。在本文中,我们的目标是回顾一系列现有的政策工具,以支持利用森林进行CDR,并展示政策设计文献中的概念如何增进我们对这一领域的理解。我们探讨不同政策工具的利用如何塑造我们利用森林缓解和适应气候变化的能力,并考虑政策组合与整合的挑战,仔细研究国际森林政策的三个领域,包括《京都议定书》的清洁发展机制、减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+)以及自愿碳抵消市场。鉴于这是我们的专长,我们随后详细考察美国的情况,美国缺乏积极实施国家气候政策,但有潜力通过在公共和私人土地上进行重新造林和现有森林管理来增加CDR。为使基于森林的CDR取得成功,必须在各种背景下实施一系列政策工具,着眼于克服政策设计在政策结果不确定性、围绕同时为碳管理森林和其他目标的政策一致性以及跨治理背景和层面的整合方面的挑战。

相似文献

1
Forest policy and management approaches for carbon dioxide removal.用于二氧化碳去除的森林政策与管理方法。
Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20200001. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0001. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.设计一个保护发展中国家森林的碳市场。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.
3
A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.美国森林与碳储量相关知识的综合概述。
Ecol Appl. 2011 Sep;21(6):1902-24. doi: 10.1890/10-0697.1.
4
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix?减少毁林和森林退化所致排放(REDD+):游戏规则改变者还是又一个权宜之计?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:137-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
5
Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country.有证据表明,在一个森林覆盖率高、森林砍伐率低的国家,国家 REDD+ 计划减少了森林覆盖的损失和碳排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24492-24499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904027116. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion.森林、气候和政策文献缺乏对环境正义、多样性、公平和包容的承认。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;358:120804. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120804. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance.REDD+融资及其治理面临的挑战与经验教训。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 May 18;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00228-y.
8
Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马孙自愿 REDD+ 项目的碳减排被夸大。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24188-24194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004334117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives.利用欧洲森林实现气候目标的权衡。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):259-262. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0577-1. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
Evaluating the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential of improved forest management and accelerated forest conversion in Norway.评估改进森林管理和加速挪威森林转换的陆地二氧化碳去除潜力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Sep;26(9):5087-5105. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15228. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Wood-Derived Biochar on Germination, Physiology, and Growth of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Turkey Oak (Quercus cerris L.).木质生物炭对欧洲山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)和土耳其栎(Quercus cerris L.)发芽、生理及生长的影响
Plants (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;11(23):3254. doi: 10.3390/plants11233254.
2
Ecological Effect of Ecological Engineering Projects on Low-Temperature Forest Cover in Great Khingan Mountain, China.中国大兴安岭低温森林覆盖的生态工程项目的生态影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010625.

本文引用的文献

1
Comment on "The global tree restoration potential".论“全球树木恢复潜力”。
Science. 2019 Nov 29;366(6469). doi: 10.1126/science.aaz0111.
2
Comment on "The global tree restoration potential".论“全球树木恢复潜力”。
Science. 2019 Oct 18;366(6463). doi: 10.1126/science.aay8060.
3
Comment on "The global tree restoration potential".论“全球树木恢复潜力”。
Science. 2019 Oct 18;366(6463). doi: 10.1126/science.aay7976.
4
The global tree restoration potential.全球树木恢复潜力。
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):76-79. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0848.
5
Opinion: Managing for disturbance stabilizes forest carbon.观点:应对干扰进行管理可稳定森林碳储量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10193-10195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905146116.
6
Natural climate solutions for the United States.美国的自然气候解决方案。
Sci Adv. 2018 Nov 14;4(11):eaat1869. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1869. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs.小规模林业和碳抵消市场:佛蒙特州当前林地使用情况的实证研究,林地所有者对碳信用计划的接受意愿。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0201967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201967. eCollection 2018.
8
Top-down, Bottom-up and Sideways: The Multilayered Complexities of Multi-level Actors Shaping Forest Governance and REDD+ Arrangements in Madre de Dios, Peru.自上而下、自下而上和横向:塑造秘鲁马德雷德迪奥斯森林治理和 REDD+ 安排的多层次行动者的复杂情况。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jul;62(1):98-116. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0982-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.非工业私有林所有者参与加利福尼亚州碳补偿市场的意愿
Environ Manage. 2017 Nov;60(5):882-895. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0918-0. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Assessing the INDCs' land use, land use change, and forest emission projections.评估国家自主贡献的土地利用、土地利用变化和森林排放预测。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2016 Dec 8;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13021-016-0068-3. eCollection 2016 Dec.