• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于理解公众对二氧化碳去除的认知及风险应对的行为框架

Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal.

作者信息

Shrum Trisha R, Markowitz Ezra, Buck Holly, Gregory Robin, van der Linden Sander, Attari Shahzeen Z, Van Boven Leaf

机构信息

Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.

出版信息

Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20200002. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0002. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2020.0002
PMID:32832068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7435046/
Abstract

The adoption of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies at a scale sufficient to draw down carbon emissions will require both individual and collective decisions that happen over time in different locations to enable a massive scale-up. Members of the public and other decision-makers have not yet formed strong attitudes, beliefs and preferences about most of the individual CDR technologies or taken positions on policy mechanisms and tax-payer support for CDR. Much of the current discourse among scientists, policy analysts and policy-makers about CDR implicitly assumes that decision-makers will exhibit unbiased, rational behaviour that weighs the costs and benefits of CDR. In this paper, we review behavioural decision theory and discuss how public reactions to CDR will be different from and more complex than that implied by rational choice theory. Given that people do not form attitudes and opinions in a vacuum, we outline how fundamental social normative principles shape important intergroup, intragroup and social network processes that influence support for or opposition to CDR technologies. We also point to key insights that may help stakeholders craft public outreach strategies that anticipate the nuances of how people evaluate the risks and benefits of CDR approaches. Finally, we outline critical research questions to understand the behavioural components of CDR to plan for an emerging public response.

摘要

要采用足以减少碳排放的二氧化碳去除(CDR)技术,需要个人和集体随着时间推移在不同地点做出决策,以实现大规模推广。公众和其他决策者对大多数单个CDR技术尚未形成强烈的态度、信念和偏好,也未就CDR的政策机制和纳税人支持问题表明立场。目前科学家、政策分析师和政策制定者之间关于CDR的许多讨论都隐含地假定,决策者会表现出公正、理性的行为,权衡CDR的成本和收益。在本文中,我们回顾行为决策理论,并讨论公众对CDR的反应将如何不同于理性选择理论所暗示的反应,且更为复杂。鉴于人们并非在真空中形成态度和观点,我们概述基本社会规范原则如何塑造重要的群体间、群体内和社会网络过程,这些过程会影响对CDR技术的支持或反对。我们还指出一些关键见解,可能有助于利益相关者制定公众宣传策略,以预见人们评估CDR方法的风险和收益的细微差别。最后,我们概述了关键研究问题,以了解CDR的行为组成部分,为即将出现的公众反应做好规划。

相似文献

1
Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal.用于理解公众对二氧化碳去除的认知及风险应对的行为框架
Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20200002. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0002. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Rooting carbon dioxide removal research in the social sciences.将二氧化碳去除研究扎根于社会科学。
Interface Focus. 2020 Oct 6;10(5):20190138. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0138. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
6
Mutual reinforcement of land-based carbon dioxide removal and international emissions trading in deep decarbonization scenarios.深度脱碳情景下陆地二氧化碳去除与国际排放交易的相互强化作用
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 21;15(1):7160. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49502-8.
7
The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity.公平的二氧化碳清除责任与能力之间的全球失衡。
Natl Sci Rev. 2023 Oct 1;10(12):nwad254. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad254. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
9
The Effects of Carbon Dioxide Removal on the Carbon Cycle.二氧化碳去除对碳循环的影响。
Curr Clim Change Rep. 2018;4(3):250-265. doi: 10.1007/s40641-018-0104-3. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Risks of relying on uncertain carbon dioxide removal in climate policy.在气候政策中依赖不确定的二氧化碳去除方法的风险。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61106-4.
2
Enhanced Rock Weathering for Carbon Removal-Monitoring and Mitigating Potential Environmental Impacts on Agricultural Land.增强型岩石风化去除碳-监测和减轻对农业用地的潜在环境影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;58(39):17215-17226. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c02368. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
3
Attention, sentiments and emotions towards emerging climate technologies on Twitter.推特上对新兴气候技术的关注、情绪和情感。
Glob Environ Change. 2023 Dec;83:102765. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102765.
4
Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways.确定我们未来的气候政策:关于负排放和太阳辐射管理途径的专家意见。
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2022;27(8):58. doi: 10.1007/s11027-022-10030-9. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change.随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以测试促进家庭采取行动应对气候变化的行为干预措施。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.
2
The global tree restoration potential.全球树木恢复潜力。
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):76-79. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0848.
3
Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends.社会学习与党派偏见对气候趋势解读的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9714-9719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722664115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.两党公众支持气候政策的心理障碍。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):492-507. doi: 10.1177/1745691617748966.
5
Legacy motivations & the psychology of intergenerational decisions.代际动机与代际决策的心理学
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Apr;26:19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
6
Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils.增加农田土壤有机碳的全球封存潜力。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 14;7(1):15554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8.
7
Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative.动态规范促进可持续行为,即使这种行为与规范背道而驰。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1663-1674. doi: 10.1177/0956797617719950. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
8
Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.合理调整二氧化碳去除规模。
Science. 2017 May 19;356(6339):706-707. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9726. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
Social norms as solutions.作为解决方案的社会规范。
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):42-43. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8317.
10
Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices.利用决策路径调查为气候工程政策选择提供信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):560-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508896113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.