Magliano Dianna J, Macefield Vaughan G, Ellis Tracey M, Calkin Anna C
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 15;3(4):773-779. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00056. eCollection 2020 Aug 14.
Inequities for women exist across many leverage points of an academic career in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) disciplines, ranging from poorer success rates at promotion, reduced grant success, and a lower likelihood of invited conference presentations, to a propensity to undertake the lion's share of academic service roles. Moreover, an almost intractable salary gap exists, along with a stark under-representation of women in senior scientific leadership roles, widespread throughout the United States, United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia. Numerous factors have been put forward as contributors to this disparity, including the notions that these inequities are a result of a pipeline issue and that women are less qualified or have less experience than men, implicit bias, a lack of flexibility in the work place, a lack of role models, the use of biased measures of success for promotion, and the lack of equitable parental leave programs. In this viewpoint, we address factors shown to contribute to the lack of women in leadership roles. Specifically, we look at systemic barriers, parental and carer leave, and domestic barriers, and we present solutions to address these barriers across an individual's professional and personal life. For women to achieve equity in senior scientific leadership roles, we believe that barriers across all facets of life need to be addressed and that the important contributions that women make and have made to STEMM need to be recognized.
在科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)学科的学术生涯中,女性在多个关键环节面临不平等问题,包括晋升成功率较低、获得资助的成功率降低、受邀在会议上发言的可能性较小,以及承担大部分学术服务工作的倾向。此外,几乎难以解决的薪资差距依然存在,在美国、英国、欧洲和澳大利亚,女性在高级科学领导职位上的代表性严重不足。许多因素被认为是造成这种差距的原因,包括认为这些不平等是由于人才输送问题导致的,以及女性比男性资质较差或经验较少、隐性偏见、工作场所缺乏灵活性、缺乏榜样、在晋升中使用有偏见的成功衡量标准,以及缺乏公平的育儿假计划。在这一观点中,我们探讨了导致女性缺乏领导职位的相关因素。具体而言,我们审视了系统性障碍、育儿和照顾者休假以及家庭障碍,并提出了解决这些障碍的方案,以贯穿个人的职业和个人生活。为了让女性在高级科学领导职位上实现平等,我们认为需要解决生活各个方面的障碍,并且需要认可女性对STEMM已经做出和正在做出的重要贡献。