Olivera-La Rosa Antonio, Chuquichambi Erick G, Ingram Gordon P D
Department of Psychology and Social Sciences, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Transversal 514A #67B 90, Medellín, Colombia.
Human Evolution and Cognition Group, associated group to IFISC (University of the Balearic Islands - CSIC), Carr. de Valldemossa, km 7.5, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Nov 1;166:110200. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110200. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
Previous research suggests that individual differences in pathogen disgust sensitivity and social anxiety predict avoidance behavior, especially of pathogen cues, and reduced tolerance for social ambiguity. Conversely, generalized social trust is associated with approach behavior and a greater tolerance for social ambiguity. We conducted an online study ( = 1078) to test these predictions in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Specifically, we assessed whether individual differences in pathogen disgust sensitivity, social anxiety and generalized social trust predicted judgments of trustworthiness, desired social distance and perceptions of sickness of target faces wearing surgical masks. Our results showed that (a) high sensitivity to pathogen disgust predicted lower judgments of trustworthiness and lower social desirability; (b) high social anxiety predicted higher perceptions of illness and lower judgments of trustworthiness; and (c) generalized social trust predicted higher judgments of trustworthiness and lower perceptions of illness of target faces. Further, we found that mask wearers were perceived as more likely to be ill, more trustworthy and more socially desirable than the same faces presented to a control group, without the surgical mask superimposed. Results are discussed in terms of perceived compliance with an emerging social norm overriding the intrinsic untrustworthiness of masked faces.
先前的研究表明,病原体厌恶敏感性和社交焦虑的个体差异预示着回避行为,尤其是对病原体线索的回避,以及对社会模糊性的耐受性降低。相反,普遍的社会信任与趋近行为以及对社会模糊性的更高耐受性相关。我们进行了一项在线研究(N = 1078),以在新冠疫情全球大流行的背景下检验这些预测。具体而言,我们评估了病原体厌恶敏感性、社交焦虑和普遍社会信任的个体差异是否能预测对佩戴外科口罩的目标面孔的可信度判断、期望的社交距离和患病感知。我们的结果表明:(a)对病原体厌恶的高敏感性预示着较低的可信度判断和较低的社会合意性;(b)高社交焦虑预示着更高的患病感知和较低的可信度判断;(c)普遍社会信任预示着对目标面孔的更高可信度判断和更低的患病感知。此外,我们发现,与呈现给对照组的相同面孔(未叠加外科口罩)相比,佩戴口罩的人被认为更有可能患病、更值得信赖且更具社会合意性。我们从对一种新兴社会规范的感知遵从角度讨论了研究结果,这种社会规范凌驾于蒙面面孔固有的不可信之上。