George Bert, Verschuere Bram, Wayenberg Ellen, Zaki Bishoy Louis
Ghent University.
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):696-700. doi: 10.1111/puar.13255. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
If the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything, it is that policy makers, experts, and public managers need to be capable of interpreting comparative data on their government's performance in a meaningful way. Simultaneously, they are confronted with different data sources (and measurements) on COVID-19 without necessarily having the tools to assess these sources strategically. Because of the speed with which decisions are required and the different data sources, it can be challenging for any policy maker, expert, or public manager to make sense of how COVID-19 has an impact, especially from a comparative perspective. Starting from the question "How can we benchmark COVID-19 performance data across countries?," this article presents important indicators, measurements, and their strengths and weaknesses, and concludes with practical recommendations. These include a focus on measurement equivalence, systems thinking, spatial and temporal thinking, multilevel governance, and multimethod designs.
如果说新冠疫情给我们带来了什么教训的话,那就是政策制定者、专家和公共管理者需要有能力以有意义的方式解读关于其政府表现的比较数据。与此同时,他们面对的是关于新冠疫情的不同数据来源(和衡量标准),却不一定拥有从战略角度评估这些来源的工具。由于决策需要迅速做出,且数据来源各异,对于任何政策制定者、专家或公共管理者来说,理解新冠疫情如何产生影响,尤其是从比较的角度,都可能具有挑战性。本文从“我们如何对各国的新冠疫情表现数据进行基准对比?”这一问题出发,介绍了重要指标、衡量标准及其优缺点,并给出了实用建议。这些建议包括关注衡量标准的等效性、系统思维、时空思维、多层次治理和多方法设计。