• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们信任信任:新冠疫情期间对政府的信任对超额死亡率的影响。

In trust we trust: The impact of trust in government on excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Zaki Bishoy Louis, Nicoli Francesco, Wayenberg Ellen, Verschuere Bram

机构信息

Department of Public Governance and Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Public Governance and Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Ghent, Belgium Department of Economics, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Policy Adm. 2022 Apr;37(2):226-252. doi: 10.1177/09520767211058003.

DOI:10.1177/09520767211058003
PMID:35400855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8977432/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought forward myriad challenges to public policy, central of which is understanding the different contextual factors that can influence the effectiveness of policy responses across different systems. In this article, we explore how trust in government can influence the ability of COVID-19 policy responses to curb excess mortality during the pandemic. Our findings indicate that stringent policy responses play a central role in curbing excess mortality. They also indicate that such relationship is not only influenced by systematic and structural factors, but also by citizens' trust in government. We leverage our findings to propose a set of recommendations for policymakers on how to enhance crisis policymaking and strengthen the designs of the widely used underlying policy learning processes.

摘要

新冠疫情给公共政策带来了诸多挑战,其中核心挑战是理解不同的背景因素,这些因素会影响不同系统中政策应对措施的有效性。在本文中,我们探讨了对政府的信任如何影响新冠疫情政策应对措施在疫情期间遏制超额死亡率的能力。我们的研究结果表明,严格的政策应对措施在遏制超额死亡率方面发挥着核心作用。研究结果还表明,这种关系不仅受到系统和结构因素的影响,还受到公民对政府的信任的影响。我们利用研究结果为政策制定者提出了一系列建议,内容涉及如何加强危机决策以及完善广泛使用的基础政策学习过程的设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/ac16f1cd3155/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/616f3c93cae9/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/7e68cebe2f5f/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/aa3661083fae/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/ac16f1cd3155/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/616f3c93cae9/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/7e68cebe2f5f/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/aa3661083fae/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1647/8977432/ac16f1cd3155/10.1177_09520767211058003-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
In trust we trust: The impact of trust in government on excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.我们信任信任:新冠疫情期间对政府的信任对超额死亡率的影响。
Public Policy Adm. 2022 Apr;37(2):226-252. doi: 10.1177/09520767211058003.
2
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
3
Trust in the government increases financial well-being and general well-being during COVID-19.在新冠疫情期间,对政府的信任会提升财务状况和总体幸福感。
J Behav Exp Finance. 2021 Sep;31:100514. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100514. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.信任与透明度在危机时期:英国 COVID-19 疫情第一波(2020 年 4 月)期间在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0239247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239247. eCollection 2021.
6
Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité: An experimental study of citizens' perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 in eight countries.自由、平等、可信度:关于八个国家公民对政府应对新冠疫情反应认知的一项实验研究
Public Adm Rev. 2023 Jan 5. doi: 10.1111/puar.13588.
7
Determinants of Political Trust during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Putting Policy Performance into Evidence.新冠疫情最初几个月期间政治信任的决定因素:将政策绩效纳入证据范畴
Polit Stud Rev. 2023 Feb;21(1):82-98. doi: 10.1177/14789299211056193.
8
Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19.公民对政府的信任是善治以及政府机构在新冠疫情期间在社交媒体上提供高质量信息的函数。
Gov Inf Q. 2021 Oct;38(4):101597. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
The role of mGovernment applications in building trust during public crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic.移动政务应用在公共危机期间建立信任方面的作用:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e32476. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32476. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
10
Citizens' Willingness to Support New Taxes for COVID-19 Measures and the Role of Trust.公民支持为新冠疫情措施开征新税的意愿及信任的作用。
Polit Policy. 2021 Jun;49(3):534-565. doi: 10.1111/polp.12404. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures during the onset of the pandemic in Australia: investigating the role of trust in federal and state governments and scientists.澳大利亚疫情初期对新冠疫情防控措施的遵守情况:探究信任在联邦和州政府以及科学家方面所起的作用
Aust J Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;75(1):2224453. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2224453. eCollection 2023.
2
Does Government Trust Matter? The Effectiveness of Policy Responses in the Health-Disaster Era.政府信任重要吗?卫生灾难时代政策应对的有效性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;13(9):959. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090959.
3
How is political trust associated with economic and environmental policy prioritization? A longitudinal analysis between 2017 and 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature.信任与新冠疫情:信任的后果及对信任而言的后果是什么?文献的早期综述
Polit Stud Rev. 2021 May;19(2):274-285. doi: 10.1177/1478929920948684.
2
Nudges against pandemics: Sweden's COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective.应对大流行病的助推措施:透视瑞典的新冠疫情防控策略
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 19;39(3):478-493. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783787. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Policy learning and crisis policy-making: quadruple-loop learning and COVID-19 responses in South Korea.
政治信任如何与经济和环境政策的优先排序相关?2017 年至 2022 年的纵向分析。
Ambio. 2025 Jan;54(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02054-z. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
The impact of social cohesion and risk communication on excess mortality due to COVID-19 in 213 countries: a retrospective analysis.社会凝聚力和风险沟通对 213 个国家 COVID-19 超额死亡率的影响:回顾性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19076-7.
5
National governance and excess mortality due to COVID-19 in 213 countries: a retrospective analysis and perspectives on future pandemics.213 个国家的国家治理与 COVID-19 超额死亡:回顾性分析与未来大流行的展望。
Global Health. 2023 Oct 31;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00982-1.
6
In the COVID-19 pandemic, who did we trust? An eight-country cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们信任谁?一项八国横断面研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 1;13:06036. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06036.
7
Assessing the impact of local context and priorities regarding domestic disease outbreaks and imported risk on early pandemic response: Cross-continental comparisons.评估国内疾病爆发和输入性风险相关的地方背景和优先事项对大流行早期应对的影响:跨大陆比较。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;11:1147768. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147768. eCollection 2023.
8
Trust as a key measure of quality and safety after the restriction of family contact in Canadian long-term care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加拿大长期护理机构限制家属探访后,信任成为衡量质量和安全的关键指标。
Health Policy. 2023 Feb;128:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.009. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
9
Excess all-cause mortality in the USA and Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 and 2021.2020 年和 2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间美国和欧洲的全因超额死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 3;12(1):18559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21844-7.
10
Impact of pre-pandemic travel mobility patterns on the spatial diffusion of COVID-19 in South Korea.疫情前出行流动模式对韩国新冠病毒病空间传播的影响
J Transp Health. 2022 Sep;26:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101479. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
政策学习与危机决策:韩国的四重循环学习与新冠疫情应对措施
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 28;39(3):363-381. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1785195. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses.动员应对新冠疫情的政策(无)能力:理解各国应对措施的差异
Policy Soc. 2020 Jul 3;39(3):285-308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Policy preferences in response to negative economic prospects of COVID-19: A survey-experiment among local politicians in four European countries.应对新冠疫情负面经济前景的政策偏好:对四个欧洲国家地方政客的一项调查实验
Public Adm. 2022 Jun;100(2):356-374. doi: 10.1111/padm.12729. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Public Trust and Policy Compliance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Professional Trust.新冠疫情期间的公众信任与政策合规:专业信任的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;9(2):151. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020151.
7
Public support for European cooperation in the procurement, stockpiling and distribution of medicines.公众支持欧洲在药品采购、储备和分发方面的合作。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):253-258. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa201.
8
Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间对公共卫生政策的信任与遵守
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104316. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early covid-19 pandemic in the U.S.口罩、政策、行为对美国早期新冠疫情的因果影响
J Econom. 2021 Jan;220(1):23-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Early lessons from COVID-19 response and shifts in authority: public trust, policy legitimacy and political inclusion.新冠疫情应对的早期经验教训与权力转移:公众信任、政策合法性与政治包容性。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):854-855. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa181.