• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动员应对新冠疫情的政策(无)能力:理解各国应对措施的差异

Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses.

作者信息

Capano Giliberto, Howlett Michael, Jarvis Darryl S L, Ramesh M, Goyal Nihit

机构信息

University of Bologna, Italy.

Simon Fraser University, Canada.

出版信息

Policy Soc. 2020 Jul 3;39(3):285-308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628
PMID:35039722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8754710/
Abstract

The objective of this collection of essays is to gain insights into the different national-level state responses to COVID-19 around the world and the conditions that shaped them. The pandemic offers a natural experiment wherein the policy problem governments faced was the same but the responses they made were different, creating opportunities for comparison of both the kinds of policy tools being used and the factors that accounted for their choice. Accordingly, after surveying on-line databases of policy tools used in the pandemic and subjecting these to topic modelling to reveal the characteristics of a 'standard' national pandemic response, we discuss the similarities and differences found in specific responses. This is done with reference to the nature and level of policy capacity of respective governments, highlighting the critical roles played by (in)adequate preparation and lesson-drawing from past experiences with similar outbreaks or crises. Taken together the articles show how the national responses to the COVID-19 pandemic were shaped by the opportunity and capacity each government had to learn from previous pandemics and their capacity to operationalize and build political support for the standard portfolio of policy measures deployed to deal with the crisis. However, they also show how other factors such as the nature of national leadership, the organization of government and civil society, and blindspots towards the vulnerabilities of certain population segments also helped to shape policy responses to the pandemic.

摘要

本文集的目的是深入了解世界各地各国政府对新冠疫情的不同应对措施以及形成这些措施的条件。这场大流行提供了一个自然实验,即政府面临的政策问题相同,但做出的应对措施却不同,这为比较所使用的政策工具种类以及影响其选择的因素创造了机会。因此,在对大流行期间使用的政策工具在线数据库进行调查并对其进行主题建模以揭示 “标准” 国家大流行应对措施的特征之后,我们讨论了在具体应对措施中发现的异同。这是参照各国政府政策能力的性质和水平进行的,强调了充分准备以及从过去类似疫情或危机的经验中吸取教训所发挥的关键作用。这些文章共同表明,各国政府对新冠疫情的应对措施是如何受到每个政府从以往大流行中学习的机会和能力以及它们为应对危机而部署的标准政策措施组合进行实施和争取政治支持的能力所塑造的。然而,它们也表明,其他因素,如国家领导层的性质、政府和民间社会的组织形式以及对某些弱势群体的忽视,也有助于塑造对疫情的政策应对。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/cbc7845e54ba/rpas_a_1787628_f0004_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/662888c2b3c6/rpas_a_1787628_f0001_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/e805f9381c4a/rpas_a_1787628_f0002_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/3fe465ced295/rpas_a_1787628_f0003_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/cbc7845e54ba/rpas_a_1787628_f0004_b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/662888c2b3c6/rpas_a_1787628_f0001_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/e805f9381c4a/rpas_a_1787628_f0002_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/3fe465ced295/rpas_a_1787628_f0003_oc.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a54d/8754710/cbc7845e54ba/rpas_a_1787628_f0004_b.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses.动员应对新冠疫情的政策(无)能力:理解各国应对措施的差异
Policy Soc. 2020 Jul 3;39(3):285-308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong.低信任状态下的政策制定:香港的合法性、国家能力与对新冠疫情的应对
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 23;39(3):403-423. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Capacity and crisis: examining the state-level policy response to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu, India.能力与危机:审视印度泰米尔纳德邦针对新冠疫情的州级政策应对措施
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):153-164. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae096.
4
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
5
Learning from past pandemic governance: Early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea.从过去的疫情治理中学习:韩国新冠病毒检测中的早期应对与公私合作
World Dev. 2021 Jan;137:105198. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105198. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.新冠疫情下的比较政治学:理解政府应对措施的必要性。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
The imperative of state capacity in public health crisis: Asia's early COVID-19 policy responses.公共卫生危机中政府治理能力的必要性:亚洲早期应对新冠疫情的政策举措
Governance (Oxf). 2022 Jul;35(3):777-798. doi: 10.1111/gove.12695. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Breaking the chain: Governmental frugal innovation in Kerala to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.打破链条:喀拉拉邦政府为抗击新冠疫情进行的节俭创新
Gov Inf Q. 2021 Jan;38(1):101549. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101549. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
9
International, national and local trends in the spread of COVID-19: a geographic view of COVID-19 spread and the role to be played by coproduction.COVID-19 的国际、国家和地方传播趋势:COVID-19 传播的地理视角以及共同创作的作用。
10
Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Seven obstacles to learning from public inquiries in the wake of the crisis.从新冠疫情中吸取教训:危机过后从公开调查中学习的七个障碍。
Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2022 Jun;13(2):165-175. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12240. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the dual dilemma between lives, rights and livelihoods: COVID-19 responses in China, Singapore, and South Korea.应对生命、权利与生计的双重困境:中国、新加坡和韩国的新冠疫情应对措施
Z Vgl Polit. 2022;16(4):707-731. doi: 10.1007/s12286-023-00555-x. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Explaining international differences in excess mortality due to Covid-19.解释新冠疫情导致的超额死亡率的国际差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92403-z.
3
Workers' Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mathematical models as public troubles in COVID-19 infection control: following the numbers.数学模型作为 COVID-19 感染控制中的公共问题:关注数字。
Health Sociol Rev. 2020 Jul;29(2):177-194. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1764376. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
A Guide to Benchmarking COVID-19 Performance Data.新冠疫情表现数据基准指南。
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):696-700. doi: 10.1111/puar.13255. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Fighting COVID-19 through Government Initiatives and Collaborative Governance: The Taiwan Experience.通过政府举措与协同治理抗击新冠疫情:台湾经验
巴西新冠疫情最初几个月期间工人的心理困扰:一项横断面研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;15(3):358. doi: 10.3390/bs15030358.
4
A study of Chinese enterprises' business models to determine the impact of dynamic capabilities on innovation and performance.一项关于中国企业商业模式的研究,以确定动态能力对创新和绩效的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):e0310854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310854. eCollection 2025.
5
Optimizing emergency response systems in urban health crises: A project management approach to public health preparedness and response.优化城市卫生危机中的应急系统:一种公共卫生防范与应对的项目管理方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041279.
6
Evaluating climate-related financial policies' impact on decarbonization with machine learning methods.运用机器学习方法评估气候相关金融政策对脱碳的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):1694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85127-7.
7
Has the educational use of digital technologies changed after the pandemic? A longitudinal study.疫情之后,数字技术的教育用途发生变化了吗?一项纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0311695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311695. eCollection 2024.
8
Capacity and crisis: examining the state-level policy response to COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu, India.能力与危机:审视印度泰米尔纳德邦针对新冠疫情的州级政策应对措施
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):153-164. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae096.
9
Containment Measures and Alcohol Consumption Among Drinking Higher Education Students Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multilevel Analysis in 25 Countries.新冠疫情之前及期间饮酒的高等教育学生的防控措施与酒精消费:25个国家的多层次分析
J Prev (2022). 2025 Apr;46(2):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00807-w. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
10
Mixed methods approach to examining the implementation experience of a phone-based survey for a SARS-CoV-2 test-negative case-control study in California.采用混合方法研究在加利福尼亚州进行基于电话的 SARS-CoV-2 检测阴性病例对照研究的实施经验。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0301070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301070. eCollection 2024.
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):665-670. doi: 10.1111/puar.13239. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
4
States Divided: The Implications of American Federalism for COVID-19.各州分化:美国联邦制对新冠疫情的影响
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):595-602. doi: 10.1111/puar.13243. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis.分期科学:新冠疫情危机中模型与测量的权威性和脆弱性
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):610-615. doi: 10.1111/puar.13219. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Fighting COVID-19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation: Wicked Policy Problems and New Governance Challenges.以敏捷、透明和参与抗击新冠疫情:棘手的政策问题与新的治理挑战
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Jul-Aug;80(4):651-656. doi: 10.1111/puar.13214. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0).COVID-19 政府应对事件数据集(CoronaNet v.1.0)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):756-768. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0909-7. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Serologic Responses from a Sample of U.S. Navy Service Members - USS Theodore Roosevelt, April 2020.2020 年 4 月美国海军西奥多·罗斯福号航母上的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和血清学反应样本。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 12;69(23):714-721. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e4.
9
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic.大规模防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):262-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.