An Brian Y, Porcher Simon, Tang Shui-Yan, Kim Eunji Emily
Georgia Institute of Technology.
IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School.
Public Adm Rev. 2021 Nov-Dec;81(6):1157-1182. doi: 10.1111/puar.13426. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
To understand the extent to which a policy instrument's early adoption is crucial in crisis management, we leverage unique worldwide data that record the daily evolution of policy mandate adoptions and COVID-19 infection and mortality rates. The analysis shows that the mask mandate is consistently associated with lower infection rates in the short term, and its early adoption boosts the long-term efficacy. By contrast, the other five policy instruments-domestic lockdowns, international travel bans, mass gathering bans, and restaurant and school closures-show weaker efficacy. Governments prepared for a public health crisis with stronger resilience or capacity and those with stronger collectivist cultures were quicker to adopt nationwide mask mandates. From a policy design perspective, policymakers must avoid overreacting with less effective instruments and underreacting with more effective ones during uncertain times, especially when interventions differ in efficacy and cost.
为了解政策工具的早期采用在危机管理中的关键程度,我们利用了全球范围内独特的数据,这些数据记录了政策指令采用情况以及新冠病毒感染率和死亡率的每日变化。分析表明,口罩指令在短期内始终与较低的感染率相关,其早期采用能提高长期效果。相比之下,其他五项政策工具——国内封锁、国际旅行禁令、大规模集会禁令以及餐厅和学校关闭——效果较弱。具有更强恢复力或能力以及更强集体主义文化的政府,为应对公共卫生危机做好了更充分准备,能更快地在全国范围内采用口罩指令。从政策设计的角度来看,政策制定者在不确定时期必须避免对效果较差的工具反应过度,而对效果较好的工具反应不足,尤其是当干预措施在效果和成本方面存在差异时。